Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "basetextformatter".
Did you mean:
base_text_formatter
2009 Mar 15
0
rspec 1.2.0 Released
...uld
* negative_failure_message => failure_message_for_should_not
* All references to rubygems have been removed from within rspec''s code.
* See http://gist.github.com/54177 for rationale and suggestions on
alternative approaches to loading rubygems
* deprecations
* BaseTextFormatter#colourize - use colorize_failure instead.
* BaseTextFormatter#magenta - use red instead.
* enhancements
* cleaner integration with with heckle-1.4.2
* allow registering example groups with a path-like key (Pat Maddox)
* start DRb service at "druby://localhost:0" (Hongli Lai) - S...
2006 Dec 21
1
heres how to get color output in rspec_autotest with rspec 0.7.5
....rb
2006-12-21 01:42:44.000000000 -0800
+++ rspec-0.7.5_with_colour_patch/lib/spec/runner/formatter/
base_text_formatter.rb 2006-12-21 01:47:16.000000000 -0800
@@ -5,10 +5,11 @@ module Spec
# non-text based ones too - just ignore the +output+ constructor
# argument.
class BaseTextFormatter
- def initialize(output, dry_run=false, colour=false)
+ def initialize(output, dry_run=false, colour=false,
force_colour=false)
@output = output
@dry_run = dry_run
- @colour = colour
+ @colour = colour || force_colour
+ @force_colou...
2007 Dec 09
1
[rspec-devel] rspec_on_rails (trunk - r3070) works with Rails 2.0.1
...2 and 3073. Can you
>>>>> align those and try again?
>>>>>
>>>>>> rails:2.0.1. Formatter in this case is Specdoc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The odd part is that debugger is telling me that BaseFormatter,
>>>>>> BaseTextFormatter and SpecdocFormatter all take one argument. I
>>>>>> don''t
>>>>>> have the gem installed, so I''m not sure where Ruby is getting
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> from, as the code shows 2, options and where.
>>>...