search for: basetation

Is there a command line way to tell me whether a ethernet connection is 100 BaseT or Gigabit Ethernet? Craig

Hello, I have just install Asterisk software on my pc (PIII, 2Ghz, 512Mo, Linux 2.4.20 ) connected to a LAN (10 BaseT). I use on the users Pc (Xp windows) a client IAX Phone ( Sokol & Associates\IaxPhone). In my very good surprise all works correctly, but I have a little problem of sound quality: When I use the Voicemail the quality of sound is affected with a noise like "Scrrr"

New Stuff from Pandora at http://pan.zipcon.net/NEWS-OCT-18-07.html Mozart Quintet in Eb Major K 452: piano with oboe, clarinet, horn and bassoon Neal O'Doan and the Soni Ventorum woodwind ensemble. Beethoven Trio from Creatures of Prometheus: oboe, baset horn and piano Laila Storch, William McColl and Anita Cummings. The baset horn played by McColl is a copy

I'm not advocating AAA. However this is a proposal for more modern thinking regarding the permissiveness of auto in LLVM codebases. Currently the rule on the use of auto is here: https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#use-auto-type-deduction-to-make-code-more-readable It is quite strict. It allows the use of auto for * lambdas * iterators because they are long to type * casts to

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 6:25 PM Chris Lattner via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Generally no IMO, because the cases that produce optional are not obvious. > Just to say, +1 from me too. > > > * Can we use auto in c++14 lambda arguments with llvm::find_if(C, > [](const auto& i) { ... }) for example? > > * We need to use auto for structured

Thanks Ayal! I'll take a look at DENBench. As another data point - I tried enabling this on our internal benchmarks. I'm seeing one regression, and it seems to be a regression of the "good" kind - without interleaving we don't vectorize the innermost loop, and with interleaving we do. The vectorized loop is actually significantly faster when benchmarked in isolation, but in

We checked the gathered data again. All regressions that we see are in 32-bit mode. The 64-bit mode looks good overall. - Elena From: Michael Kuperstein [mailto:mkuper at google.com] Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2016 02:56 To: Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> Cc: Demikhovsky, Elena <elena.demikhovsky at intel.com>; Matthew Simpson <mssimpso at codeaurora.org>;

Has anyone tried using Windows 2000 Professional with Samba? I'm checking it out now, and when I try to connect to a share, I get an error message similiar to the one you get with Win98 and NT4 with SP3+ with encrypted passwords. Does anyone know the equivelant registry path to set plain text passwords? The NT4 path doesn't seem to exist:

NICs with Linux. > > I think I have tracked down the problem though. even > though it may not > > look like it, I think that the 3com NIC is bad. I put a 10 > baseT only > > Realtek card in a cliant, and it works fine.. Is there any > known problems > > with 3COM 905b's running at 10 Mbits and SAMBA. anyway, I > think I will > > buy Intel NICs

Hi Ayal, Elena, I'd really like to enable this by default. As I wrote above, I didn't see any regressions in internal benchmarks, and there doesn't seem to be anything in SPEC2006 either. I do see a performance improvement in an internal benchmark (that is, a real workload). Would you be able to provide an example that gets pessimized? I have no doubt you've seen regressions

I have SLOW file transfers across samba to my Windows Server 2000 domain. I am using a built in 100bT Intel Pro NIC, I have tried the built in gigabit NIC and a PCI 3com, all with the same results. Using iperf, I get about 45-90Mb of bandwidth from my PC's to my samba server. I can pull it up by \\servername <file:///\\servername> or \\ipaddress <file:///\\ipaddress> with out

Thanks Ayal! On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Zaks, Ayal <ayal.zaks at intel.com> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > > > Don’t quite have a full reproducer for you yet. You’re welcome to try and > see what’s happening in 32 bit mode when enabling interleaving for the > following, based on “https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YIQ#From_RGB_to_YIQ”: > > > > void rgb2yik

Is anyone in the world making gsm 'picocells' which could be connected to an Asterisk server and allow gsm mobiles to roam to them (and therefore become just another extension) when in the office? Obviously lots of things to consider (it's a licensed band) which I think was the big holdup last time I asked this question anywhere. I know there was talk about using them on aircraft

We are using rsync to backup files from a bunch of computers to a central server using rsync in --daemon mode. I've got a problem and are looking for suggestions. I'm not a newbie to rsync and have checked the archives without getting any useable conclusions. Our old server works great - a redhat 7.2 / 2.4.18 machine. But it's getting full and there's no more updates for

Can anyone shed some light on this subject? I don't have a clue where to begin looking. It's RHL 6.0, Samba 2.0.3, stock kernel. Kevin --- |\ _,,,---,,_ ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Kevin Alan Pieckiel '---''(_/--' `-'_) kapieckiel@harding.edu (This message was written with

So turns out it is a full reproducer after all (choosing to vectorize on AVX), good. > The details are in PR29025. Interesting. (So we should carefully insert unconditional branches inside shuffle sequences, eh? ;-) > But if we modify the program by adding "*out++ = 0" right after "*out++ = q;" (thus eliminating the pesky <12 x i8>), we get: Indeed such

Hi Everyone ! I note that all of samba AD server that i maintain are not so fast in terms of data transfer, more specifically none of them go over 40 MB/s , one particularly which i'm trying to find out why doesn't go over 20 MB/s , transfering data using other protocols like FTP , rsync , rsync over ssh on any of these machines i can easily achieve 80 MB/s ,i also can get the same on

On Dec 16, 2018, at 11:44 AM, Stephen Kelly via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 25/11/2018 14:43, Stephen Kelly via llvm-dev wrote: >> However this is a proposal for more modern thinking regarding the permissiveness of auto in LLVM codebases. >> Currently the rule on the use of auto is here: > > Hi, > > Thanks for the input on this topic,

Any comments on CentOS 5 on Intel Atom CPUs? I need to build a couple of inexpensive systems that will be used primarily as gateway/firewall systems with OpenVPN, and need recommendations in reliable hardware platforms. These will need two NICs. Bill -- INTERNET: bill at celestial.com Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way Voice:

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:52 AM Joan Lluch <joan.lluch at icloud.com> wrote: > > Hi Roman, > > Is "test" actually an implementation of a 64-bit-wide multiplication > compiler-rt builtin? > Then i'd think the main problem is that it is being optimized in the > first place, you could end up with endless recursion… > > > No, this is not a compiler-rt