search for: baseobject

...trying to understand this issue. On this specific point, please see: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4511#section-4.5.1.2 4.5.1.2. SearchRequest.scope Specifies the scope of the Search to be performed. The semantics (as described in [X.511]) of the defined values of this field are: baseObject: The scope is constrained to the entry named by baseObject. * singleLevel: The scope is constrained to the immediate * subordinates of the entry named by baseObject. wholeSubtree: The scope is constrained to the entry named by baseObject and to all its subordinates....

Hi Rowland, Sorry to inform that none of thus packages solve my problem. But today, with some Tranquil.it helps, I have some news: - Upgrade from 4.11.14 -> 4.12.9 is OK - Upgrade from 4.12.9 -> 4.13.2 : problem is present with Tranquil.it AND Louis package - Fresh install + member join with 4.13.2 is OK (Centos AND Buster packages) Problem only occur when upgrading member to 4.13.2 with

...cific point, please see: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4511#section-4.5.1.2 > > 4.5.1.2. SearchRequest.scope > > Specifies the scope of the Search to be performed. The semantics > (as > described in [X.511]) of the defined values of this field are: > > baseObject: The scope is constrained to the entry named by > baseObject. > > * singleLevel: The scope is constrained to the immediate > * subordinates of the entry named by baseObject. > > wholeSubtree: The scope is constrained to the entry named by > baseObj...

...89* ??? Source Port: 60549 ??? Destination Port: 389 ??? Length: 99 ??? Checksum: 0x7950 [unverified] ??? [Checksum Status: Unverified] ??? [Stream index: 0] ??? [Timestamps] *Connectionless Lightweight Directory Access Protocol* ??? LDAPMessage searchRequest(10556) "<ROOT>" baseObject ??????? messageID: 10556 ??????? protocolOp: searchRequest (3) ??????????? searchRequest ??????????????? baseObject: ??????????????? scope: baseObject (0) ??????????????? derefAliases: neverDerefAliases (0) ??????????????? sizeLimit: 0 ??????????????? timeLimit: 0 ??????????????? typesOnly...

...86723 10.5.1.25 -> 10.5.1.202 LDAP 80 bindResponse(1) success 14 32.686854 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 TCP 66 40253→389 [ACK] Seq=15 Ack=15 Win=5840 Len=0 TSval=121046258 TSecr=361876478 15 32.694734 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 LDAP 183 searchRequest(2) "<ROOT>" baseObject 16 32.695277 10.5.1.25 -> 10.5.1.202 LDAP 219 searchResEntry(2) "<ROOT>" | searchResDone(2) success 17 32.722454 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 TCP 1514 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 18 32.722455 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 LDAP 107 bindRequest(3) "&l...

...- Name Query response NB 192.168.0.4 3. C->S: DNS SRV _ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.domain.name 4. S->C: DNS SRV 0 100 389 server.domain.name 5. C->S: DNS A server.domain.name 6. S->C: DNS A 192.168.0.4 7. C->S: CLDAP search request "<ROOT>" baseobject a. Filter: DnsDomain=domain.name && Host=CLIENT && NtVer=0x00000016 b. Attributes: netlogon 8. S->C: CLDAP searchresentry a. Type: netlogon b. Opcode: LOGON_SAM_LOGON_RESPONSE_EX c. Flags: GoodTimeServ, Writable, Closest, Timeserv, KDC, DS,...

...e are the packet details for the search request: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol LDAPMessage searchRequest(2) "OU=People,OU=Users,OU=LSE,DC=corp,DC=lsexperts,DC=de" wholeSubtree messageID: 2 protocolOp: searchRequest (3) searchRequest baseObject: OU=People,OU=Users,OU=LSE,DC=corp,DC=lsexperts,DC=de scope: wholeSubtree (2) derefAliases: neverDerefAliases (0) sizeLimit: 2 timeLimit: 0 typesOnly: False Filter: (mail=martin.sofaru at lsexperts.de)...

Hello, Is it not Samba that is listening to the LDAP ports and is serving me the answer to my query? This problem does not only happen when the LDAP database is searched using ldapsearch, it happens also using other tools that connect to the LDAP ports. I still don't fully grasp what this has to do with the uniqueness of the sAMAccountNames - they are unique throughout my directory and I

...check the contents of the ldap database. The instructions in the book say to do this: ldapsearch -x -h localhost -s base - \ Dcn=Administrator,cn=Users,dc=server-02,dc=domain-02,dc=harte-lyne,dc=ca -W Which produces this output: # extended LDIF # # LDAPv3 # base <> (default) with scope baseObject # filter: (objectclass=*) # requesting: - Dcn=Administrator,cn=Users,dc=server-02,dc=domain-02,dc=harte-lyne,dc=ca -W # # dn: # search result search: 2 result: 0 Success # numResponses: 2 # numEntries: 1 Which I take to be a success given the result. But this does not ask for the Password as...

...0.5.1.25 -> 10.5.1.202 LDAP 80 bindResponse(1) success > 14 32.686854 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 TCP 66 40253→389 [ACK] Seq=15 Ack=15 Win=5840 Len=0 TSval=121046258 TSecr=361876478 > 15 32.694734 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 LDAP 183 searchRequest(2) "<ROOT>" baseObject > 16 32.695277 10.5.1.25 -> 10.5.1.202 LDAP 219 searchResEntry(2) "<ROOT>" | searchResDone(2) success > 17 32.722454 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 TCP 1514 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] > 18 32.722455 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 LDAP 107 bindRequ...

...9 dc.ik.local 0.003773 192.168.1.253 -> 192.168.10.16 DNS 71 Standard query 0xd961 A dc.ik.local 0.003930 192.168.10.16 -> 192.168.1.253 DNS 87 Standard query response 0xd961 A 192.168.10.16 0.008004 192.168.1.253 -> 192.168.10.16 CLDAP 161 searchRequest(1) "<ROOT>" baseObject 0.009669 192.168.10.16 -> 192.168.1.253 CLDAP 168 searchResEntry(1) "<ROOT>" searchResDone(1) success 7.488021 192.168.1.253 -> 192.168.10.16 CLDAP 161 searchRequest(2) "<ROOT>" baseObject 7.489684 192.168.10.16 -> 192.168.1.253 CLDAP 168 searchResEntr...

...s://github.com/Benoitsob/vdi-ldap-proxy). I configured it to use my domain name and ran it. I pointed vdiManager to the IP address of the proxy and it works. I'm building my base image as I type. So, it seems that the problem is that vdiManager puts in extra whitespace in the ldap query eg. baseObject: dc=test, dc=lan. There shouldn't be a space after the comma. The proxy takes the malformed request, removes the whitespace and forwards it to the AD server. This is great for a short term workaround, but I was wondering if the developers would consider updating Samba so it will accept a que...

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > This mean that the printer try to auth in LDAP 'plain' (no SSL, no > > TLS), and so samba refuse that? > No, it means that Samba is refusing to accept a NTLM or Kerberos > authenticated connection without SIGN or SEAL negotiated, as an > attacker could take over an unprotected network connection and do

...-> 10.5.1.202 LDAP 80 bindResponse(1) success >> 14 32.686854 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 TCP 66 40253???389 [ACK] Seq=15 Ack=15 Win=5840 Len=0 TSval=121046258 TSecr=361876478 >> 15 32.694734 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 LDAP 183 searchRequest(2) "<ROOT>" baseObject >> 16 32.695277 10.5.1.25 -> 10.5.1.202 LDAP 219 searchResEntry(2) "<ROOT>" | searchResDone(2) success >> 17 32.722454 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 TCP 1514 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] >> 18 32.722455 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 LDAP 107...

...tweight Directory Access Protocol >> LDAPMessage searchRequest(2) >> "OU=People,OU=Users,OU=LSE,DC=corp,DC=lsexperts,DC=de" wholeSubtree >> messageID: 2 >> protocolOp: searchRequest (3) >> searchRequest >> baseObject: >> OU=People,OU=Users,OU=LSE,DC=corp,DC=lsexperts,DC=de >> scope: wholeSubtree (2) >> derefAliases: neverDerefAliases (0) >> sizeLimit: 2 >> timeLimit: 0 >> typesOnly: False >>...

...17088389-1001 This appears to be ok. Although when I put a tcpdumo trace I see: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol LDAPMessage searchRequest(161) "dc=flores,dc=com" wholeSubtree messageID: 161 protocolOp: searchRequest (3) searchRequest baseObject: dc=flores,dc=com scope: wholeSubtree (2) derefAliases: neverDerefAliases (0) sizeLimit: 0 timeLimit: 15 typesOnly: False Filter: (&(sambaSID=S-1-5-21-1299536883-3844537390-917088389-513)(objectclass...

...request: > > Lightweight Directory Access Protocol > LDAPMessage searchRequest(2) > "OU=People,OU=Users,OU=LSE,DC=corp,DC=lsexperts,DC=de" wholeSubtree > messageID: 2 > protocolOp: searchRequest (3) > searchRequest > baseObject: > OU=People,OU=Users,OU=LSE,DC=corp,DC=lsexperts,DC=de > scope: wholeSubtree (2) > derefAliases: neverDerefAliases (0) > sizeLimit: 2 > timeLimit: 0 > typesOnly: False > Filter: (ma...

Dear Samba users and developers, we had the idea of storing S/MIME certificates in the Samba 4 LDAP. In the Windows Active Directory Users and Computers tool I can use the "Published Certificates" tab to add a certificate to a user account. As Mozilla Thunderbird requests the "userCertificate;binary" attribute of a user when sending encrypted mail, the LDAP response is empty.

...s cached I also know that the tls key authentication is working because I can run an ldap query against the domain # ../../bin/ldapsearch -x -Z -h dbmtrdcdev01.emeadev.addev.jpmorganchase.com -s base -b "" "objectclass=*" # extended LDIF # # LDAPv3 # base <> with scope baseObject # filter: objectclass=* # requesting: ALL # # dn: currentTime: 20071121191608.0Z ...... .... And so on... Any help would be much apprehicated. Thanks, Paddy ----------------------------------------- This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an offer or solici...

> > I can't recall but are you able to get a packet trace? This may > help further troubleshoot. I'll look into this. However, Rowland stated that bind9 will be the only solution. > > Just to recap you do you both servers listed as available DNS servers > on your workstations? As well as your member server? Yes, of course. For member servers, this is the