search for: based_sysvol_replication_workaround

...ng the impatient > > person I am, I needed more real time. > > > > Now my problem is with the permissions in the sysvol folder structure. > > > > Sorry, but your problem is that you missed this: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bidirectional_Rsync/osync_ > based_SysVol_replication_workaround#FAQ > > Where it quite clearly says this: > > Why can't I simply use a distributed filesystem like GlusterFS, > Lustre, etc. for SysVol? > A cluster file system with Samba requires CTDB to be able to do it > safely. And CTDB and AD DC are incompatible. > &gt...

...> Now my problem is with the permissions in the sysvol folder > > > > structure. > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, but your problem is that you missed this: > > > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bidirectional_Rsync/osync_ > > > based_SysVol_replication_workaround#FAQ > > > > > > Where it quite clearly says this: > > > > > > Why can't I simply use a distributed filesystem like GlusterFS, > > > Lustre, etc. for SysVol? > > > A cluster file system with Samba requires CTDB to be able > &g...

...eal time. > > > > > > Now my problem is with the permissions in the sysvol folder > > > structure. > > > > > > > Sorry, but your problem is that you missed this: > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bidirectional_Rsync/osync_ > > based_SysVol_replication_workaround#FAQ > > > > Where it quite clearly says this: > > > > Why can't I simply use a distributed filesystem like GlusterFS, > > Lustre, etc. for SysVol? > > A cluster file system with Samba requires CTDB to be able > > to do it safely. And CTDB a...

Hi Guys, I have run into a very interesting problem using GPO's on our DC's. As you may (or may not) know, we have migrated to a pure Samba4 (Git stable branch checkout) AD network. I can't be happier. *Kudos to the Samba team* We are running to DC's, DC1 and DC2, both full fledged DC's, both running CentOS 6.9, fully up to date. For the sysvol partition I decided to run a