search for: base_class

I have a couple models that inherit from a base class that then inherits from AR. When they are used in a polymorphic relationship the "type" is always the base class. Just curious if anyone has a reason why it doesn''t use the *actual* class rather then the base_class. I have patched AR to use the actual class if !base_class.table_exists? but it adds another query each time (which in turn fails some of the rails tests). My only guess was for use with STI, but even then I am not sure if there is a better solution then using the base_class -Eric -- You receiv...

..."acts_as_versioned" label to the model file - generated a migration file - added the table creation code and the command "Post.create_versioned_table" to the migration file - ran "rake migrate" What I got is the error "undefined local variable or method ''base_class'' for Post:Class". I tried with other models and kept getting the same error. It seems like "rake migrate" is missing the right environment setup, and thus can''t find the Post class defined in the model file. Is there some step I''ve overlooked? Thanks a...

...::AssociationProxy#set_belongs_to_association_for and ActiveRecord::Associations:: HasManyAssociation#construct_sql it''s clear why. >From ActiveRecord::Associations::AssociationProxy#set_belongs_to_association_for: record["#{@reflection.options[:as]}_type"] = @owner.class.base_class.name.to_s Removing the call to base_class results in the behavior I expected. I did this by patching the two classes at runtime from a file in lib/. I guess my question is, are my expectations wrong here or is this a bug? The inclusion of base_class strikes me as something someone meant to do....

Hi all I have the following plugin code: module IncenseCrud def self.included(base_class) base_class.extend(ClassMethods) end module ClassMethods def performs_incense_crud def index list return render(:action => ''list'') end end end end In init.rb I have the following: require File.dirname(__FILE__) + ''/lib/i...

It looks like cached-model is broken again under rails 1.1. Can anyone confirm? Note that the exception below indicates it''s trying to treat CachedModel as the class name of the model, rather than using the proper class name (which is Entry in this case, and the table called entries). This is a model using Single Table Inheritance and acts_as_tree, and worked just fine under 1.0 and

...Place < ActiveRecord::Base class City < Place lets say I have a City on the @place whenever I try using the render @place I will get an error, saying the templace cities/city doesn''t exist but I do have a places/place template. Is the any nice way to add this fallback for the base_class on these cases? Also in search, I have collections with several types of items so I''d have to manually render each item using class.base_class.name to force using place instead of city when rendering the item Is that the best/only solution? Thanks -- You received this message because...

...specific defm and all of the classes > it inherits from. So here's why I think the for loop proposal can't be a preprocessing phase. Down in the guts of this I fundamentally need to be able to do this: multiclass blah<list<int> Values> { for v = Values { def DEF#v : base_class<v>; } } Will that work? Is the for loop evaluated after parameter binding? I like the for loop idea. But it can't be "just" a preprocessing step. Also, I know I introduced the #..# "pasting" operation but I've found it to be too limiting. In this example:...

...s is not working the way i thought it should be, what am i doing wrong? Here''s an example .. I''m storing model data in the index like this: doc << Field.new( "object_id", object.id, Field::Store::YES) doc << Field.new( "type", object.class.base_class.to_s, Field::Store::YES) This is working fine, i get something like this: >> i[0] => Document { stored/uncompressed,indexed,<object_id:3> stored/uncompressed,indexed,<type:Category> } Now I want to search for all documents, with a specific type.. here''s my na...

...(David A. Greene) writes: > So here's why I think the for loop proposal can't be a preprocessing > phase. Down in the guts of this I fundamentally need to be able to do > this: > > multiclass blah<list<int> Values> { > for v = Values { > def DEF#v : base_class<v>; > } > } > > Will that work? Is the for loop evaluated after parameter binding? I think I can actually make this work using the existing multidef feature code. The ideas are fundamentally the same. I do like the for syntax a lot better. Che-Liang, would you mind if I pla...

...and I''ve added this method to my controller: def vote_up return unless logged_in? rateable = @rateable_class.find(params[:id]) # Delete the old ratings for current user Rating.delete_all(["rateable_type = ? AND rateable_id = ? AND user_id = ?", @rateable_class.base_class.to_s, params[:id], @current_user.id]) rateable.add_rating Rating.new(:rating => 1, :user_id => @current_user.id) end Is there a way to dynamically update (ajax) the rating in my view without having to refresh the page? I''ve tried link_to_remote and am loading javascript file...

Hello, I have set up that uses single table inheritance. I have a number of model subclasses following the example in AWDWR that uses Manager < Employee < Person. First question. Do I need to create controller classes for each? I don''t think I do because a single controller should be able to shunt the data between the models and the views. Second question. Say I have a view

...anager *) tm = 0x00007fd133cfb570 I suspect each one may be different root cause. I was able to capture one callstack of a small repro: Breakpoint 1, DWARFASTParserClang::ParseChildMembers (this=0x8c4520, sc=..., parent_die=..., class_clang_type=..., class_language=lldb::eLanguageTypeUnknown, base_classes=..., member_accessibilities=..., member_function_dies=..., delayed_properties=..., default_accessibility=@0x7ffdf3888cac: lldb::eAccessPublic, is_a_class=@0x7ffdf3888cab: false, layout_info=...) at /home/engshare/third-party2/lldb/3.8.0.rc3/src/llvm/tools/lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DW...

...> I suspect each one may be different root cause. I was able to capture one > callstack of a small repro: > > Breakpoint 1, DWARFASTParserClang::ParseChildMembers (this=0x8c4520, > sc=..., parent_die=..., class_clang_type=..., > class_language=lldb::eLanguageTypeUnknown, > base_classes=..., member_accessibilities=..., > member_function_dies=..., delayed_properties=..., > default_accessibility=@0x7ffdf3888cac: lldb::eAccessPublic, > is_a_class=@0x7ffdf3888cab: false, layout_info=...) > at > /home/engshare/third-party2/lldb/3.8.0.rc3/src/llvm/tools/lldb/sou...

...may be different root cause. I was able to capture one >> callstack of a small repro: >> >> Breakpoint 1, DWARFASTParserClang::ParseChildMembers (this=0x8c4520, >> sc=..., parent_die=..., class_clang_type=..., >> class_language=lldb::eLanguageTypeUnknown, >> base_classes=..., member_accessibilities=..., >> member_function_dies=..., delayed_properties=..., >> default_accessibility=@0x7ffdf3888cac: lldb::eAccessPublic, >> is_a_class=@0x7ffdf3888cab: false, layout_info=...) >> at >> /home/engshare/third-party2/lldb/3.8.0.rc3/src...

...>> So here's why I think the for loop proposal can't be a preprocessing >> phase. Down in the guts of this I fundamentally need to be able to do >> this: >> >> multiclass blah<list<int> Values> { >> for v = Values { >> def DEF#v : base_class<v>; >> } >> } >> >> Will that work? Is the for loop evaluated after parameter binding? > > I think I can actually make this work using the existing multidef > feature code. The ideas are fundamentally the same. I do like the > for syntax a lot better....

Consider the following: class Event belongs_to :event_object, :polymorphic => true end class Asset < ActiveRecord::Base end class EventedAsset < Asset has_one :event, :as => :event_object end EventedAsset.find(:first).event generates the following SQL: SELECT * FROM `events` WHERE (events.event_object_id = 1 AND events.event_object_type = ''Asset'') LIMIT 1

...when @reflection.options[:as] @finder_sql = "#{@reflection.quoted_table_name}.#{@reflection.options[:as]}_id = #{@owner.quoted_id} AND " + "#{@reflection.quoted_table_name}.#{@reflection.options[:as]}_type = #{@owner.class.quote_value(@owner.class.base_class.name.to_s)}" else @finder_sql = "#{@reflection.quoted_table_name}.#{@reflection.primary_key_name} = #{@owner.quoted_id}" end @finder_sql << " AND (#{conditions})" if conditions end This cannot easily be changed. The type condit...

...For example: class MyModel < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :parent, :polymorphic => true end I would expect: MyModel.where(:parent => a) to be equivalent to: MyModel.where("my_models.parent_id = ? AND my_models.parent_type = ?", a.id, a.class.base_class.name) Is there a philosophical reason it doesn''t make this transformation? - ff P.S.: After writing this, I realize it''s not just for polymorphism. I would expect the NON-polymorphic case to transform: MyModel.where(:parent => a) into MyModel.where("my_models.pa...

...ause. I was able to capture >>> one callstack of a small repro: >>> >>> Breakpoint 1, DWARFASTParserClang::ParseChildMembers (this=0x8c4520, >>> sc=..., parent_die=..., class_clang_type=..., >>> class_language=lldb::eLanguageTypeUnknown, >>> base_classes=..., member_accessibilities=..., >>> member_function_dies=..., delayed_properties=..., >>> default_accessibility=@0x7ffdf3888cac: lldb::eAccessPublic, >>> is_a_class=@0x7ffdf3888cab: false, layout_info=...) >>> at >>> /home/engshare/third-party...

Hi! I got a class named EinsatzFilter which I serialized to session. Before saving to session it works afterwards I keep getting the message: "undefined method `to_s'' for #<Person:0x38c6ab8>". "Person" is a from ActiveRecord::Base inherited class. Code: class EinsatzFilter include ApplicationHelper attr_reader :personen, :monat, :projekte, :kunde