search for: barracudas

My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". I have not problem with the emails it noted as being rejected. But I've always thought of "barracuda" as a commercial product. I have neither configured nor enabled any barracuda software and "yum list '*barrac*'" comes up empty. What is this? Jon -- Jon

On Tue, July 19, 2016 10:06 pm, Jon LaBadie wrote: > My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen > section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". > > I have not problem with the emails it noted as > being rejected. But I've always thought of "barracuda" > as a commercial product. Maybe it is your server that had been "barracuded"?

On 07/19/2016 10:06 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote: > My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen > section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". > > I have not problem with the emails it noted as > being rejected. But I've always thought of "barracuda" > as a commercial product. > > I have neither configured nor enabled any barracuda > software

On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Jon LaBadie wrote: >My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen >section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". > >I have not problem with the emails it noted as >being rejected. But I've always thought of "barracuda" >as a commercial product. > >I have neither configured nor enabled any barracuda >software and

Normally I don't like posting on this list for off-topic info, but I need to know "un-biased" opinions regarding Barracuda's Spam Firewall as we're looking to get one soon where I work and I want to know any pros/cons before I stake my credibility on it for our spam fighting. If you've had good or bad experiences with one of these devices, please contact me _off_ list

Hi all, I''m getting a very strange problem with a recent OpenSolaris b134 install. System is: Supermicro X5DP8-G2 BIOS 1.6a 2x Supermicro AOC-SAT2-MV8 1.0b 11 Seagate Barracuda 1TB ES.2 ST31000340NS drives If I have any of the 11 1TB Seagate drives plugged into the controller, the AOC-SAT2-MV8 BIOS appears to detect them just fine, but I get the following problems: 1. Grub takes a

On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 23:06 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen > section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". Is this a C7 issue, as opposed to C5 or C6 matter ? Was the section empty or populated with entries ? -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union.

Is this list archived anywhere in an easily searchable format? I'd like to check the archives before asking a question that's already been answered... tia, Christian ---------------------------------------------- Christian Cryder [christianc@atmreports.com] Internet Architect, ATMReports.com Barracuda - http://barracuda.enhydra.org ----------------------------------------------

Roland, On 2020-09-10 21:27, Roland wrote: >> with rsync hanging - after breakout on /home for writing I then get: >> "Read-only file system" > > if your filesystem switches to read-only, you have a serious problem > with your system/storage, not with rsync. > > rsync (or the workload) is simply triggering the problem. Thanks for the response . . Hmm . .

Hi, I had a power failure, and the on-disk configuration for vinum went bizarre. The logs read from disks are at http://biaix.org/pk/debug/ (log.$DEVICE files). The logs in da0 (barracuda) are the ones obviously wrong, I'm pretty sure the others are ok. Is this a 'virtually' dead drive? Can I force vinum to use the other's drive configuration? What's the less traumatic

If I want to use a batch of new Seagate 3TB Barracudas with Solaris 11, will zpool let me create a new pool with ashift=12 out of the box or will I need to play around with a patched zpool binary (or the iSCSI loopback)? -- Dave Pooser Manager of Information Services Alford Media http://www.alfordmedia.com

Greetings, I have three drives; they are all SATA Seagate Barracudas; two are 500GB; the third is a 2TB. I don't have a clear reason why they have failed (possibly due to a deep, off-brand, flakey mobo; but it's still inconclusive, but I would like to find a disaster recovery service that can hopefully recover the data. Much thanks for any and all sugge...

Hi folks, an Asterisk (www.asterisk.org) box will be built with the following specs and I wanted to know if CENTOS has a built process/config/parameter/special distro to target the AMD Opteron Dual Core plataform: 2 amd opteron 265 dual core 1.8 Ghz 2mb l2 cache 2x1024 ocz c2-6400 dual channel gold GX XTC 2 Seagate 16mb cache 300 GB barracuda 7200 drives another 2 Seagate 500 GB 16mb cache

Hi, I'm not sure this is supposed to happen (my computer rebooted halfway through adding an other drive to a volume): [long lines needed] (02:44:50 <~>) 0 $ sudo vinum ld D storage State: up Device /dev/ad0d Avail: 38166/381 66 MB (100%) D worthless State: up Device /dev/ad2d Avail: 38038/380 38 MB (100%) D barracuda

Hi. Is the problem with ZFS supporting 4k sectors or is the problem mixing 512 byte and 4k sector disks in one pool, or something else? I have seen alot of discussion on the 4k issue but I haven''t understood what the actual problem ZFS has with 4k sectors is. It''s getting harder and harder to find large disks with 512 byte sectors so what should we do? TIA...

On Tue, March 23, 2010 19:46, Kevin Duraj wrote: > I am merging 300 indexes at once, it takes less than a day for merge > to happen for 100 million documents, during merging I notice very heavy IO. That IO sounds pretty normal. To help with IO load, we have a dedicated index store cluster, dedicated source data cluster, dedicated indexing cluster, etc. Sigh. Each time I think we have

Hi all, I have some questions about h323. Is it mandatory to install a oh323 or I can do h323 calls without patching or adding any new drivers ti asterisk? I did compile the asterisk with channel driver chan_h323 but it still gives me this error: [Feb 28 18:12:58] WARNING[1902]: app_dial.c:1081 dial_exec_full: Unable to create channel of type 'H323' (cause 66 - Channel not implemented)

I have received the below notice about the rsync list. There is a worm among us. ------- Forwarded message follows ------- Return-Path: <postmaster@innevi.com> Received: from bleep.innevi.com ([64.30.26.9]) by mail.dubois-king.COM (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1K7n3p14977 for <ppalumbo@dubois-king.com>; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 02:49:03 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain;

Hi folks, I have Samba 2.2.1a running as our PDC, and I go to make a share on my Win 2000 dev box (ie. this is NOT a smb share; my box is just querying the pdc for a list of domain users and groups). When it lists the specific users and groups, I only see user names, not any groups that exist on PDC. 1. How do I get groups to show up (for instance, let's say the PDC's /etc/group has a

Can anyone recommend one to run under CentOS? Dnk Sent from my iPhone