Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "barraclough".
2000 Aug 28
2
is win.print() broken or am I doing something wrong?
...; of zero size in the print queue- this just sits until I
enter
dev.off()
at which point a blank sheet is printed
Is it me or is this a bug?
Incidentally if i just select the print button when the plot is selected
immediately after producing the plot it prints just fine
Dominic
Dr Dominic J Barraclough
Dept Neurobiology and Anatomy,
University of Rochester,
601 Elmwood Av, Box 603,
Rochester
NY 14642
tel (716) 2753627
dominic_barraclough at urmc.rochester.edu
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~ho...
2000 Aug 24
0
Is there a method to calculate Huynh and Feldt adjustments for sphericity violations
Hi,
I'm getting to grips with using R to perform repeat measures
analysis of variance and was wondering is there a potted method to
obtain Huynh and Feldt or other adjustments for sphericity
violations?
Thanks
Dominic
Dr Dominic J Barraclough
Dept Neurobiology and Anatomy,
University of Rochester,
601 Elmwood Av, Box 603,
Rochester
NY 14642
tel (716) 2753627
dominic_barraclough at urmc.rochester.edu
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~ho...
2004 Jan 12
1
question about how summary.lm works
Hi,
While exploring how summary.lm generated its output I came across a section
that left me puzzled.
at around line 57
R <- chol2inv(Qr$qr[p1, p1, drop = FALSE])
se <- sqrt(diag(R) * resvar)
I'm hoping somebody could explain the logic of these to steps or
alternatively point me in the direction of a text that will explain these
steps.
In particular I'm puzzled
2004 Feb 20
0
setting options when using eval
Hi All,
I'm using a call to eval to evaluate a linear model, however, I have found
that despite calling
options (contrasts=c("contr.sum", "contr.poly"))
prior to evaluation, my model factors are coded using the indicator
coding associated with the "contr.treatment" contrast option
As an inelegant work around I am setting the contrast option explicitly in