Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "barnwal".
2011 Sep 10
2
Error : subscript out of bounds
...mp;&(u[k]<51))
{
n<-n+1
m[n,j]<-price_rand[k]
}
}
}
}
I am getting error in assigning the values to a matrix.
*Error in m[n, j] <- price_rand[k] : subscript out of bounds*
*
*
How to correct this ?
Please suggest me the correct method.
Thanx for the help in the advance
--
Avinash Barnwal
Final year undergraduate student
Statistics and informatics
Department of Mathematics
IIT Kharagpur
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2011 Dec 03
1
Shading the plot
...ot;)
plot(a2,type='l',col='red',ylab='',xlab=" ",axes=FALSE)
lines(a3,col='blue',ylab='',xlab=" ")
######################################################################################################
Thank you in the advance
--
Avinash Barnwal
Final year undergraduate student
Statistics and informatics
Department of Mathematics
IIT Kharagpur
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Plot.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2647 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attach...
2011 Nov 18
1
Producing plot using polygon function
...',ylab='',xlab=" ",axes=FALSE)
lines(time,a3,col='blue',ylab='',xlab=" ")
polygon(c(time[1:j],time[1:j]),c(x,y),col="grey")
#########################################################################################################
--
Avinash Barnwal
Final year undergraduate student
Statistics and informatics
Department of Mathematics
IIT Kharagpur
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2005 Feb 07
1
rsyncd.conf is not created although successful installation of rsync on debian but
Hi All,
I have installed rysnc-2.6.3 on my debian linux (
2.2.20-idepci #1 Sat Apr 20 12:45:19 EST 2002 i686).
While configuration it was
successful and i installed it without any error.
Now, in default installation it should create
rsyncd.conf as detault configuration file.. but it has
not been created anywhere in system.
root@jike:/tmp/temp/rsync-2.6.3# which rsync
/usr/local/bin/rsync
In
2005 Jul 30
2
multiple daemons on the same port
I thought if a daemon is already running on the default port, I
thought the additional ones started on the same port will result in an
exit with error, but somehow it seems to work just fine. If I kill the
first process, the second process seems to take control of the port.
As far as I know you can't have two processes binding to the same
port, so does that mean the second process is just