search for: bar1

Hello all, I have,say 4 R objects... bar1, bar2, bar3, bar4.. that I'd like to include in an R package "foobar". The desired functionality would be: > library(foobar) > data(foo) > ls() [1] "bar1" "bar2" "bar3" "bar4" I've tried the following two approaches: 1) I create...

Commit bbb163e18960 ("drm/nouveau/bar: implement bar1 teardown") introduced add a teardown helper function for BAR1. During initialisation of the Nouveau, initially all the teardown helpers are called once, before calling their init counterparts. For gk20a, after the BAR1 teardown function is called, the device is hanging during the initialisatio...

Dear Mentors, I will be writing test cases for IPRA for lit infrastructure. Following 2 basic test cases I have identified : Program that does not have recursive function call. Program that does have recursive calls. Please suggest some other test cases or provide some hints. Sincerely, Vivek -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...able. For the testcase sent by you earlier I have modified it as following : ;;;;; ip-regallco-simple.ll ; RUN: llc < %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=NOIPRA ; RUN: llc < %s -enable-ipra | FileCheck %s ; NOIPRA: foo: ; NOIPRA: pushq %r10 ; NOIPRA: pushq %r9 ; NOIPRA: pushq %r8 ; NOIPRA: callq bar1 ; CHECK: foo: ; CHECK-NOT: pushq %r10 ; CHECK-NOT: pushq %r9 ; CHECK-NOT: pushq %r8 ; CHECK: callq bar1 target triple = "x86_64-unknown-unknown" define void @bar1() { ret void } define preserve_allcc void @foo()#0 { call void @bar1() call void @bar2() ret void } define void @bar2() { ret...

...setups) to architecture limmitations (e.g. a setup with >15 PCI bridges, with one virtio device behind each, on x86). PCI Express spec made IO optional, so future guests will disable IO for a device in more and more configurations. This patch makes it possible for host to mirror the config in BAR1, such that these setups can work properly. Guests with old drivers can't be fixed, they will continue to work as well (or as bad) as they did previously. For this reason, changing revision id appears unnecessary - it would break setups that previously worked, partially. Future work on re-org...

...setups) to architecture limmitations (e.g. a setup with >15 PCI bridges, with one virtio device behind each, on x86). PCI Express spec made IO optional, so future guests will disable IO for a device in more and more configurations. This patch makes it possible for host to mirror the config in BAR1, such that these setups can work properly. Guests with old drivers can't be fixed, they will continue to work as well (or as bad) as they did previously. For this reason, changing revision id appears unnecessary - it would break setups that previously worked, partially. Future work on re-org...

I''m trying now to do "sudo fixrbconfig" in the terminal, and I get this: /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/powerpc-darwin8.0/ruby.h does not exist. This probably means you haven''t yet installed Xcode from the Tiger DVD. You won''t be able to compile Ruby extensions without it. Please install it then rerun this program. I''m on an intel mac. Am I unable to use

...< %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=NOIPRA > > ; RUN: llc < %s -enable-ipra | FileCheck %s > > ; NOIPRA: foo: > > should be NOIPRA-LABEL: > > > ; NOIPRA: pushq %r10 > > ; NOIPRA: pushq %r9 > > ; NOIPRA: pushq %r8 > > ; NOIPRA: calls bar1 > > If this is an exact sequence you want to match, you may use NOIPRA-NEXT > > ; CHECK: foo: > > ; CHECK-NOT: pushq %r10 > > ; CHECK-NOT: pushq %r9 > > ; CHECK-NOT: pushq %r8 > > You can just write "CHECK-NOT: push" > > > ; CHECK: callq bar1...

...=NOIPRA >> > ; RUN: llc < %s -enable-ipra | FileCheck %s >> > ; NOIPRA: foo: >> >> should be NOIPRA-LABEL: >> >> > ; NOIPRA: pushq %r10 >> > ; NOIPRA: pushq %r9 >> > ; NOIPRA: pushq %r8 >> > ; NOIPRA: calls bar1 >> >> If this is an exact sequence you want to match, you may use NOIPRA-NEXT > > >> > ; CHECK: foo: >> > ; CHECK-NOT: pushq %r10 >> > ; CHECK-NOT: pushq %r9 >> > ; CHECK-NOT: pushq %r8 >> >> You can just write "CHECK-NOT: push&...

...ernel panic as the device cannot be fully mapped. I've made modifications in nv50 and vmm to unbind the driver from this hierarchy, and modified gf100 assuming it will have the same issue. 1/4 also includes a fix where nv50 doesn't look like it checks the return value for nvkm_vmm_new for bar1. I don't know if this was intentional (eg, it could work without it). I'm wholly unfamiliar with linux graphics drivers so let me know if there's a better place for this. Jon Derrick (4): drm/nouveau/bar/nv50: check bar1 vmm return value drm/nouveau/bar/nv50: ensure BAR is mapped...

From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> The purpose of BAR1 is primarily to make memory accesses coherent. However, some GPUs do not have BAR1 functionality. For example, the GV11B found on the Xavier SoC is DMA coherent and therefore doesn't need BAR1. Implement a variant of FIFO channels that work without a mapping of instance memory through BAR1. X...

...Conduct Disorders','Attention Deficit', 'Eating Disorders', 'Substance Abuse','Developmental Disorders')) My question is, if there is a chance to force a line break in each label. The result shoud look like this: Bar1 Bar2 Bar3 Bar4 Bar5 Conduct Attention Eating Substance Developmental Disorders Disorders Disorders Abuse Disorders The result could also look like this: Bar1 Bar2 Bar3 Bar4 Bar5 | |...

.../, create:/* *invalid symlink targets = create:/etc, /bin, /boot, /dev, follow:/etc, /dev* - user can create symlinks that point anywhere except a descendant of /etc, /bin, /dev, and can follow symlinks anywhere other than to descendants of /etc and /dev *valid symlink targets = follow:%P, %P/../bar1, %P/../bar2, create:**%P, %P/../bar1, %P/../bar2* - user can follow symlinks to targets within /dir/foo/share, /dir/foo/bar1 and /dir/foo/bar2, but not to any other locations outside the share root, and can create symlinks to any location in these dirs. (but not to locations in other "wide&q...

On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 11:29:09AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: > Commit bbb163e18960 ("drm/nouveau/bar: implement bar1 teardown") > introduced add a teardown helper function for BAR1. During > initialisation of the Nouveau, initially all the teardown helpers are > called once, before calling their init counterparts. For gk20a, after > the BAR1 teardown function is called, the device is hanging duri...

From: Michael Matz > Sent: 07 October 2018 16:53 ... > I think the examples I saw from Boris were all indirect inlines: > > static inline void foo() { asm("large-looking-but-small-asm"); } > static void bar1() { ... foo() ... } > static void bar2() { ... foo() ... } > void goo (void) { bar1(); } // bar1 should have been inlined > > So, while the immediate asm user was marked as always inline that in turn > caused users of it to become non-inlined. I'm assuming the kernel guys...

...rows are all "Chain"s. I need to have consumeArg(r1) because, I don't want the producer of r1 to be scheduled between FOO and arg(r1). Similarly I need to have consumeArg(r2). However, I am not able to prevent some unrelated operation from getting scheduled between FOO and arg(r1). If BAR1 and BAR2 are unrelated operations, the following is a legal schedule : consumeArg(r1) consumeArg(r2) FOO BAR1 arg(r1) BAR2 arg(r2) This leads to illegal assembly program because the assembler expects FOO r1, r2 to appear together. How can I make the subgraph FOO->arg(r1)->arg(r2) be always...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13364 Bug ID: 13364 Summary: rsyncd clips trims relative symlinks outside of source tree Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee:

From: Yonatan Maman <Ymaman at Nvidia.com> This patch series aims to enable Peer-to-Peer (P2P) DMA access in GPU-centric applications that utilize RDMA and private device pages. This enhancement is crucial for minimizing data transfer overhead by allowing the GPU to directly expose device private page data to devices such as NICs, eliminating the need to traverse system RAM, which is the

...on 5 [0]: $ env -i USER=user HOME=/dev/shm/dovecot-test/user PATH=/usr/bin:/bin \ doveadm -c /tmp/dovecot.conf mailbox create foo2 baz2 $ env -i USER=user HOME=/dev/shm/dovecot-test/user PATH=/usr/bin:/bin \ doveadm -c /tmp/dovecot.conf mailbox create -s \ foo2/{bar1,bar2} baz2/{bar2,bar22,bar222} eps2 eps2/mamba qux2/bar2 $ env -i USER=user HOME=/dev/shm/dovecot-test/user PATH=/usr/bin:/bin \ doveadm -c /tmp/dovecot.conf exec imap S: * PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 ? LIST-EXTENDED ?] Logged in as user C: D01 LIST "" "*"...

Yes, the hairy-edges of undefined behaviour - UB is UB. It does mean that given: __attribute__((noinline)) int foo(int a, int b) { return a + b; } int bar1(int x) { return foo(x, INT_MIN); } int bar2(int x) { return x + INT_MIN; } 'bar1' and 'bar2' have different outcomes. However, I think that the new optimisation is neat and valid and I am not suggesting that it should be changed, but it would be useful if a target could override...