search for: bans

.../07/29 23:23:37.748263 [22371]: self ban - lowering our election priority 2009/07/29 23:23:37.748503 [22275]: This node has been banned - forcing freeze and recovery Now other nodes part of CTDB cluster receives the ban message, but even though the ID does not belong to its CURRENT ID, other nodes bans itself and goes into recovery mode. I guess this is not supposed to happen? node2 (should not ban itself): 2009/07/29 23:23:37.748659 [19905]: Got a ban request for pnn:0 but our pnn is 1. Ignoring ban request 2009/07/29 23:23:37.748994 [19776]: This node has been banned - forcing freeze and reco...

...d file to a web-server and block the bad IP > addresses completely from my network. I like this as if a system is > brute-forcing my SSH server, I can now block it from all resources on the > network, and stop the attempts even reaching the internal hosts. I've found the default 10min bans hardly bother some attackers. So I've added the "recidive" feature of fail2ban. After the second 10min ban, the attacker is blocked for 1 week. jon -- Jon H. LaBadie jon at jgcomp.com 11226 South Shore Rd. (703) 787-0688 (H) Reston, VA 20190...

On Friday 19 April 2019 15:19:26 Pete Biggs wrote: > > I've added a fail regex to /etc/fail2ban/filter.d/exim.conf as suggested > > on another page: > > The standard exim.conf already has a 535 filter. Was that not working > for you? I was following the instructions as shown on the page. I did find after sending my post that there was already a regex in the standard

On 05/08/2019 09:18, Pete Biggs wrote: >> I've found the default 10min bans hardly bother some attackers. >> So I've added the "recidive" feature of fail2ban. After the >> second 10min ban, the attacker is blocked for 1 week. >> > Oh definitely. My systems are set to "3 bans and you're out" - a > recidive ban is permanen...

Why are you replacing known spammers with these "banned" strings ? This forbids anti-spam filters & programs to do their jobs properly.

I've followed one of the pages on line specifically for installing fail2ban on Centos 7 and all looks fine. I've added a fail regex to /etc/fail2ban/filter.d/exim.conf as suggested on another page: \[<HOST>\]: 535 Incorrect authentication data which appears to be successfully matchnig lines in /var/log/exim/mail.log such as 2019-04-19 13:06:10 dovecot_plain

Incident Information:- Originator: "G Lalithambika"<lalithambika@mumbai.tcs.co.in> Recipients: samba@samba.org Subject: FOCHAP06 WARNING: The file FOCHAP06.DOC.pif you received was infected with the W32/SirCam@MM virus. The file attachment was not successfully cleaned.

man_in_shack banned me during a casual conversation where i was explaining my dual x server wine setup, saying I was contradicting myself. I obviously wasn't trying to contradict myself, if I did, and I don't see how this is ban-worthy under any circumstance.

On Saturday 20 April 2019 00:32:43 Pete Biggs wrote: > What ban action do you use? If it's something like iptables-multiport, > then I wonder if the fact that it's detecting the failures as > '[dovecot]' means that it's using the dovecot ports, not the exim > ports, when applying the iptable rule. > > When a host has been banned, can you look at the

> I've added a fail regex to /etc/fail2ban/filter.d/exim.conf as suggested on > another page: The standard exim.conf already has a 535 filter. Was that not working for you? > > \[<HOST>\]: 535 Incorrect authentication data > > which appears to be successfully matchnig lines in /var/log/exim/mail.log such > as > > 2019-04-19 13:06:10 dovecot_plain

I find csf/lfd much easier to configure and can be used in combination with fail2ban. Gary Stainburn <gary.stainburn at ringways.co.uk> wrote: >I've followed one of the pages on line specifically for installing fail2ban on >Centos 7 and all looks fine. > >I've added a fail regex to /etc/fail2ban/filter.d/exim.conf as suggested on >another page: > >

Hello, I'm Ziyu Yu, a gsoc applier. I'm banned from the irc: * alapagos.oftc.net NOTICE AUTH :*** Looking up your hostname... * *** Checking Ident * *** Your forward and reverse DNS do not match, ignoring hostname. * *** No Ident response * *** Banned autokilled: We suspect this host of participating in a botnet. Mail support at oftc.net if you feel this in error. (2008-03-15 16:29:08) *

I have fail2ban on my mail server monitoring Dovecot and Exim. I have noticed that it has stopped banning IP's. I have seen in /var/log/fail2ban.log: 2020-04-07 09:42:05,875 fail2ban.filter [16138]: INFO [dovecot] Found 77.40.61.224 - 2020-04-07 09:42:05 2020-04-07 09:42:06,408 fail2ban.actions [16138]: NOTICE [dovecot] Ban 77.40.61.224 2020-04-07 09:42:06,981

Is anyone using asterisk with fail2ban? I have it working except it takes way more break-in attempts than what is set in "maxretry" in jail.conf For example, I get an email saying: "The IP 199.204.45.19 has just been banned by Fail2Ban after 181 attempts against ASTERISK." when "maxretry = 5" in jail.conf Perhaps someone else is experiencing this or has resolved it,

Is there a functiaon to take the IP address of person who submits to a form example: <input id="user_ip" name="user[ip]" type="hidden" value="<%= some_ip_call %>" /> -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I'm looking for some beta testers to provide feedback on an Asterisk intrusion detection & prevention program we're releasing soon. As a quick overview, the program provides: - banning based on geographic location of source IP (Continent, country, region, city, etc) - detection and banning based on channels in use by a user - detection and banning based on rate of dialing - detection

Hello, I have read and seen many options for additions to Iptables as a firewall and security system. All seem to react to logs and not to incoming packets (as far as I have seen) I am interested in doing a number of security ideas to the firewall, iptables, on my webserver. If you have a program you would suggest or believe iptables is the proper solution, please feel free to post that. Here

> > The event that triggers the ban does complete as normal, which is what I would > expect as the ban is triggered by the log entry which is *after* the failed > attempt. > > However, after the /var/log/fail2ban.log showed the IP as banned, I continue > to see entries in /var/log/exim/main.log What ban action do you use? If it's something like iptables-multiport,

So I have been reading the ssh attack thread and finally want to ask about something. I doubt there is a program like this, but I would love to have a program that listens at common ports that I do not use at all...and only allow that program to listen to it, especially the usual ssh port (using a different one for real ssh)... That program would then, upon receiving a 'sniff' or

Greetings all, I have been seeing a lot of [Jan 2 16:36:31] NOTICE[7519]: chan_sip.c:23149 handle_request_invite: Sending fake auth rejection for device 100<sip:100 at 108.161.145.18>;tag=2e921697 in my logs lately. Is there a way to automatically ban IP address from attackers within asterisk ? Thank you