Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "banlist".
2006 Apr 12
3
[Q] Bayeisan Network with the "deal" package
...ge.
I followed the manual and paper from the author's web site to learn it, as
shown below, but I could not figure out how to access the local and
posterior probability of the nodes in the constructed network.
library(deal)
data(ksl)
ksl.nw <- network(ksl)
ksl.prior <- jointprior(ksl.nw)
banlist <- matrix(c(5,5,6,6,7,7,9,
8,9,8,9,8,9,8), ncol = 2)
ksl.nw$banlist <- banlist
ksl.nw <- learn(ksl.nw, ksl, ksl.prior)$nw
According to the manual, the local prior and posterior can be accessed for
each node using localprior()
and localposterior(). However, I got...
2005 Mar 24
1
(no subject)
...........maybe a month?
Secondly, I have some prior knowledge that only 500 out of the 10000
variales are possible parents. In another word, only those arrows startting
from the 500 variables and pointing to the remaining 99500 variables are
allowed in the network. In deal an assignment to "banlist" should help me
rule out the impossible arrows. But in my case the number of "impossible
arrows" is 500*499+99500*99549, and so the "banlist" would get
unacceptable long. Are there any methods (in deal or other packages) to
specify the parents set in advance?
Thanks a...
2005 Mar 26
0
learning networks with a large number of variables andpre-set parents.
...or knowledge that only 500 out of the 10000
> >variales are
> >> possible parents. In another word, only those arrows startting from
> >> the 500 variables and pointing to the remaining 99500 variables are
> >> allowed in the network. In deal an assignment to "banlist" should
> >> help me rule out the impossible arrows. But in my case the number of
> >> "impossible arrows" is 500*499+99500*99549, and so the "banlist"
> >> would get unacceptable long. Are there any methods (in deal or other
> >> packag...
2002 Jun 27
0
GOOD BUSINESS FOR YOU
...2002-06-26 at 13:42, Monty wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 12:20:13PM -0700, Brendan Dowling wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:41:18PM -0400, Monty wrote:
> > > No filter is perfect, some spam gets through. This pattern has been
> > > added to the banlist.
> > >
> > > Monty
> > >
> >
> >
> > Monty,
> >
> > Why don't you just make it so that only list subscribers may post
> > messages to the list? Wouldn't that make the most sense?
>
> No, that was the policy original...