search for: banged

Since you're already using bang-bang ;) library(rlang) dots1 <- function(...) as.list(substitute(list(...)))[-1L] dots2 <- function(...) as.list(substitute(...())) dots3 <- function(...) match.call(expand.dots = FALSE)[["..."]] dots4 <- function(...) exprs(...) bench::mark( dots1(1+2, "a", rnorm(3), stop("bang!")), dots2(1+2, "a",

Interestingly, as.list(substitute(...())) also works. On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 1:16 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/08/2018 4:00 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: >> >> Hi. For any number of *known* arguments, we can do: >> >> one <- function(a) list(a = substitute(a)) >> two <- function(a, b) list(a = substitute(a), b =

Hello all, I don't find anything helping me understand the llvm bang operator. In the llvm TableGen language reference, it only says: 'TableGen also has “bang operators” which have a wide variety of meanings: *'* I would be very thankful if someone can explain it to me. e.g. what does "!strconcat" or "!if" mean? Cheers ES -------------- next part --------------

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Sky Flyer <skylake007 at googlemail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > I don't find anything helping me understand the llvm bang operator. In the > llvm TableGen language reference, it only says: > > 'TableGen also has “bang operators” which have a wide variety of meanings:' > > I would be very thankful if someone can explain it

Thanks Meador, The confusion point for me is that, does ! as an operator (bang operator) add any meaning to the strconcat? On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Meador Inge <meadori at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Sky Flyer <skylake007 at googlemail.com> > wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I don't find anything helping me understand

This is a proposal to enhance TableGen's ability to analyze and manipulate DAGs. Hopefully this will allows more complex DAGs to be built in TableGen. 1. Add a new value suffix. value(index) The value must be a DAG. The index specifies the operator or an operand, whose value is produced. The index can be 0 produce the operator 1...n produce operand by

Fully up-to-date CentOS 5.2 and Firefox browser. A previous thread had a problem with plugins disappearing. I've discovered, by accident, a causal relationship. Running a Thunderbird mail client (could happen with others? Haven't tested with Evolution yet.) I click a link that opens the browser. BANG! The plugins.dat is "emptied". Restored from my rsync backup, repeat, BANG!

Currently, llvm bytecode files must begin with llvm\d where \d = {0,1,2}. Have you considered allowing a "hash bang path" to precede the llvm magic number? This would allow llvm modules to be executable on UNIX systems (and under cygwin). Would the community find this useful? I like the idea of platform-independent binaries being able to masquerade as native executibles. I'm

I'd like to export the corresponding functions from the i2c core so that I can use them in fallback bit-banging in i915.ko Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_i2c.c | 8 ++++---- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_i2c.c

Hi, I just compiled samba 3.0.23 on our Sun Solaris 8 server. 3.0.22 was running fine and I used the same compiler options for 3.0.23. $ ./configure --with-acl-support --prefix=/usr/local/samba3023 --with-quotas --with-included-popt --without-ldap --with-vfs gcc version 3.4.2 GNU Make 3.80 Running make now throws a lot these warnings: [-snip-] Linking nsswitch/libnss_wins.so ld: warning:

Thanks all, this was very helpful. Peter's finding - dots2() below - is indeed interesting - I'd be curious to learn what goes on there. The different alternatives perform approximately the same; dots1 <- function(...) as.list(substitute(list(...)))[-1L] dots2 <- function(...) as.list(substitute(...())) dots3 <- function(...) match.call(expand.dots = FALSE)[["..."]]

I have never encountered anything like this before, so thought I'd post here and see if anyone can help. We have a java application that sends out notification emails to end-users. The body of the email is some boilerplate text and HTML that is pulled from a database. When the emails are received there are random instances of " !" (that's a space and a bang symbol) inserted

I have a Win2K3 domU (and thankfully an image backup of the LVM volume that holds its system disk) I previously installed GPLPV v0.8.9 drivers, the domU boots OK with or without the /GPLPV switch in boot.ini, however with the /GPLPV switch it tries and fails to use the Xen network driver, and so the machine is network-less, so for the past few months I''ve left it using pure HVM

Karl, I think you meant to cc the llvmdev list on this. Thank you for a more detailed explanation, it's much clearer to me now. I agree that making the execution of .bc files more transparent would make it more useable as a stand-alone binary format on Unix-like systems and adding programmable support to changing the #! line would prevent much of user error involved in modifying the run

What package/code could I use to create a 3-d surface graph of the predicted values over two of the explanatory variables' coefficients? Jim James Bang Department of Economics University of Illinois Well I AM missing the back of my head.you COULD cut me a little slack! -Homer Simpson

Hi everybody, I just started thinking about a project and am seeking some help regarding its design. The idea would be to create labels (i.e. address labels).I could let users type the text manually, but I dont think they would appreciate that when they''ll want to print 5000 addresses. I can also probably let them import csv files, that should not be a problem, but playing with those

Hello, I'm running load testing sessions. My System Under Test is an asterisk 13 with 16GB, configured with maxfiles set to 400 000. This system is supposed do produce simple SIP trunking services without transcoding. The box sending call to my System Under Test is anabled with SIPp. I'm banging on a 700 concurrent calls/50 CAPS limit I would like to improve, if possible. Tests are

I'll see what I can do. However, I have to balance your need for "big bang" change with Chris' fervor for incremental changes. Making a huge change makes his review task harder. There are only seven files to merge so at most seven change sets. I'll probably get these done early next week. Sorry for the hassle, but I want to get lib/System simple, complete and working so I can

On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Misha Brukman wrote: > Karl, I think you meant to cc the llvmdev list on this. > > Thank you for a more detailed explanation, it's much clearer to me now. That does make more sense to me too. > I agree that making the execution of .bc files more transparent would > make it more useable as a stand-alone binary format on Unix-like systems > and adding

Jeff/Chris, So, I opted for the smallest "big bang" commit that made sense. Hopefully this won't be too hard for Chris to review and yet it gets the bulk of the lib/System changes over and done with. Although you'll see a log of commit messages, it turned out that the bulk of the remaining lib/System work was "remove this useless file". There are still some small