search for: bandcamp

...word a bit further. We would need to have some advance notice. The post on HydrogenAudio has pre1 in the subject line; there isn't any need to 'bump' that to pre3, but a separate thread for the actual release would stand out better for regular forum users and for Web searches. If any Bandcamp developers are on this list, can we get a blog post or other announcement (through the many channels that Bandcamp has built up over the years to artists and fans)? -- -Dec. --- "Mosaic is going to be on every computer in the world." - Marc Andreessen, 1994

...share dir has normal permissions, never changed. ? No update to the system, nothing. No user, no windows version, not even smbclient can list the user shares. ? Can you help? Gabriele ? Sonicle S.r.l.?:?http://www.sonicle.com Music:?http://www.gabrielebulfon.com eXoplanets?:?https://gabrielebulfon.bandcamp.com/album/exoplanets ?

I'm one of the co-admins of the Facebook page for FLAC. 15 hours ago, I posted a message giving a vague "heads up" that a new release is on the way. Since then there have been 3 shares, 6 comments, 128 likes and 4451 people reached. That's slightly more than the page's audience. That's more than what the previous release announcement (from November 2014) got. -- -Dec.

Op 04-12-14 om 20:05 schreef Erik de Castro Lopo: > Martjin, are you able to make your test material available? DO > you have any test scripts your use to run your tests? Sorry, most of the testmaterial isn't copylefted, and I don't think it is possible to get a nice copylefted test library. That's because most copylefted material is indie, and sadly the mastering techniques

On Jul 18, 2015, at 10:46 AM, Martijn van Beurden <mvanb1 at gmail.com> wrote: > Op 16-07-15 om 07:50 schreef Brian Willoughby: >> On Jul 14, 2015, at 8:18 AM, Declan Kelly <flac-dev at groov.ie> wrote: >>> Can anyone on the list (possibly someone who works for MSFT) get this >>> fixed before Win10 is released? >> What size differences are we talking

On 14-03-13 20:02, Declan Kelly wrote: > The next official release of the FLAC command line should really have > a "-9" option for absolute maxed-out big-memory CPU-burning compression. No. If you want such things, try TAK, OptimFROG, Monkey's Audio or even LA, you'll lose hardware compatibility anyway and they do much better than FLAC will with a -9 option. FLAC 1.0

...nd create a brand new mailbox? With Cyrus imapd I can do this by connecting as the Cyrus admin user and then create a folder "user/newuser at domain.tld". ? Thanks Gabriele ? ? Sonicle S.r.l.?:?http://www.sonicle.com Music:?http://www.gabrielebulfon.com eXoplanets?:?https://gabrielebulfon.bandcamp.com/album/exoplanets ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20230223/230b8c20/attachment.htm>

...s, Hi-Fi units, "MP3 players" and cell phones. The out and out most widely supported lossless audio format could (and should) have a better "bang for the buck" to the average user (who has possibly been tempted away from MP3 or WMV or some Apple format). I buy a lot of music on Bandcamp (and similar sites) and usually get smaller files (for long term storage) when recompressing (flac -8). A common sentiment I have seen online is "my CPU time is too valuable to bother with maximum compression", but that ignores the fact that all of the copies made of those files are going...

...% compatible with all decoders. Going beyond that to -9 or even -12 seems like it would be far less than 100% compatible. Of course, the logical approach is to look into why these decoders can only handle some FLAC encodings, and work within those restrictions. > I buy a lot of music on Bandcamp (and similar sites) and usually get > smaller files (for long term storage) when recompressing (flac -8). > A common sentiment I have seen online is "my CPU time is too > valuable to > bother with maximum compression", but that ignores the fact that > all of > the co...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03.02.2012 1:11, Declan Kelly wrote: > Many people who use FLAC to archive entire CDs (as opposed to > "albums" of tracks that may or may not be on the same CD) will rip > the entire disc and store it in a single FLAC file, with the CUE > sheet either as a separate file, embedded in the FLAC metadata, or > both. > >

...icecast base directory # You specify which group(s) have access to which mountpoints # Groups are specified in the groups.aut file. # Note that you CANNOT specify users, only groups # Separate the mountpoint from the groups with a colon, and the # groups with commas # Example: # /monkey:enterprise,bandcamp # There are two special keywords, "all" and "rest", if you specify # "all" as the mountpoint (without slash), all other mountpoint # authorization lines are ignored and only the groups specified # on the "all" line are used. # The mountpoints /admin and /oper...

...3 players" and cell phones. > The out and out most widely supported lossless audio format could (and > should) have a better "bang for the buck" to the average user (who has > possibly been tempted away from MP3 or WMV or some Apple format). > > I buy a lot of music on Bandcamp (and similar sites) and usually get > smaller files (for long term storage) when recompressing (flac -8). > A common sentiment I have seen online is "my CPU time is too valuable to > bother with maximum compression", but that ignores the fact that all of > the copies made of t...

On 16/07/13 6:31 PM, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > On 16-07-13 09:07, Leigh Dyer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On a particular input file, FLAC (testing with current git) greatly >> inflates its output if I encode at level 7, which enables >> --exhaustive-model-search. The source is a 24-bit WAV file of about >> 60MB; flac -6 encodes this to a 43MB FLAC file, but flac

On 16/07/13 8:10 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Leigh Dyer wrote: > >> Certainly -- I've uploaded the analysis files for both the -6 and -7 >> encodes, in case you wanted to compare: >> >> http://wootangent.net/~lsd/blah/6.ana >> http://wootangent.net/~lsd/blah/7.ana >> >> The encode seems to proceed normally until 59% of the way through the

Hi, On a particular input file, FLAC (testing with current git) greatly inflates its output if I encode at level 7, which enables --exhaustive-model-search. The source is a 24-bit WAV file of about 60MB; flac -6 encodes this to a 43MB FLAC file, but flac -7 produces a 9.1GB (!) file. The enormous file does seem to be perfectly valid, FWIW -- it (eventually) decodes to a WAV that's