Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "bame".
Did you mean:
bake
2006 May 09
0
setting up lotus notes 7
...98 to lnotes and notes.exe. Remember, when
>building
>wine on your own, to install cups-devel and cups for printing before
>you compile it!!
Sorry for the late reply, I haven't had much time to try this.
I now have the follwoing libs copied from my Windows XP partition:
-rw-rw-r-- 1 bame bame 1028096 2006-03-29 08:57
.wine/fake_windows/Windows/System/mfc42.dll
-rw-rw-r-- 1 bame bame 413696 2006-03-29 08:57
.wine/fake_windows/Windows/System/msvcp60.dll
-rw-rw-r-- 1 bame bame 1024000 2006-05-09 14:47
.wine/fake_windows/Windows/System/mfc42u.dll
-rw-rw-r-- 1 bame bame 406528 2006-0...
2024 Feb 28
3
Initializing vector and matrices
Is there as way to initialize a vector (matrix) with an unknown length
(dimension)? NULL does not seem to work. The lines below work with a
vector of length 4 and a matrix of 4 x 4. What if I do not know
initially the length/dimension of the vector/matrix?
All I want is to add up (accumulate)? the vector and matrix as I go
through the loop.
Or, are there other ways to accumulate such vectors
2009 May 23
0
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM with cmake on FreeBSD (was: Re: Arm port)
[snip]
> Just to clarify things: have you *tried* to build LLVM with the
> makefiles generated by cmake on your BSD system?
Just checked that the makefiles generated by cmake work with `make' on
FreeBSD 7.2 x86. The build fails while building `opt' because libdl is
missing.
--
Óscar
2009 May 23
3
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM with cmake on FreeBSD
...; makefile conditionals don't look very much alike. You
CAN'T write one makefile which will automatically work in either system, I tried
that some years ago. I could explain that, too, but I won't bore you, unless
you tell me you're interested.
I've been wanting to recode our bame, to produce one make system that would
allow makefiles to operate automatically in either environment. I haven't
started on that task, yet.
2009 May 23
3
[LLVMdev] Arm port
Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> writes:
> I've never asked for (and wouldn't personally contribute to) any project to
> generate BSD Makefiles from CMake input. My feelings are, you generate BSD
> Makefiles directly, they are NOT that complicated, and making them be generated
> like that reduces the simplicity, make troubleshooting more difficult.
Fair enough, but