search for: ballpark

Was wondering if anyone's got some ballpark performance numbers that they can share. It would be great to see some basic numbers, nothing formal. Even if it's just observations from a system you manage or monitor. I'd be most interested to see how a single server with multiple clients performs. Throughput, reads/writes and if poss...

I'm wondering whether there is a ballpark release date for Dovecot 2.4. I know an exact release date is probably not available, but can it at least be narrowed to a specific quarter? Is it likely in 2023? I have seen on previous messages that an Ubuntu repository for 22.04 (jammy) will appear with the 2.4 release. My mail server in A...

Hi All, I would like to know, is there a *ballpark* figure for how many parameters the minimisation routines can cope with? I'm asking because I was asked if I knew. Cheers, Federico -- Federico C. F. Calboli Department of Epidemiology and Public Health Imperial College, St. Mary's Campus Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG Tel +44 (0)20 75...

Hello A 4.4% geomean codesize improvement is really impressive. That stuff is hard to come by, you usually have to nibble away at it bit at a time. I ran some codesize benchmarks we have and they were in the same ballpark. Some of these are quite small so had less opportunity for outlining, but the average was still over 3% with some as high as 9-10%. All the tests I ran were fine, although we don't have a lot of -Oz AArch64 testing. Thanks for working on this, we'll have to see about getting it working fo...

...rforms quite nicely. > > > Cool, good to know. Do you have any hints/tips/guidelines for things like sizing, both in a per-server sense (memory, mostly) and in a cluster-sense (logins per sec :: node ratio)? I'm curious too how large is quite large. Not looking for details but just a ballpark figure. My largest install would have about 4 million mailboxes to handle, which I'm guessing falls well below 'quite large'. Looking at stats, our peak would be around 2000 logins/sec. I'm also curious if -- assuming they're well north of 2000 logins/sec -- the replication pro...

...0 mega-bytes per month or 3,333 calls consuming 16,043 mega-bytes per day. Assuming the busiest hour accounts for about 10% of the daily total, that hour would consist of 333 calls consuming 1,604 mega-bytes. So, my "peak" would need 4.5 mega-bits per second of bandwidth. Am I in the ballpark? Would anybody venture an estimate of what the peak bandwidth would be if we changed to IAX? With trunking? Thanks in advance, ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Steve Edwards sedwards@sedwards.com Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST Newline...

Assuming I'm using a VOIP provider of some sort, what kind of bandwidth requirements / line should I expect to have in place? I currently have 8 traditional voice lines, and a FAX line that doubles as my DSL source. Ballpark, what do I need to have in place to move everything to asterisk? Dunc

...tsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >> Now I use Google. They offer MFA opt in. And now I'm more secure than >> I was with the myopic ISP. > > "More secure" only to the level one can trust google ;-) Yes I know, but I put them in approximately the same ballpark as having to trust my proprietary CPU, and proprietary logic board's proprietary firmware. -- Chris Murphy

...eaks parameters, incrementing from 20 - 40, the histogram only changes at a couple of points on that interval. Anyone have any suggestions as to how I should create this plot? Or an explanation as to why my nbreaks parameter does not seem to force the number of intervals, but rather suggests a ballpark to be in? thanks Jim M

...a tobit model, one article suggests a normal distribution? Also, I want to censure at the upper bound, so, using the survival5 package I use: survreg(Surv(y,y<c,type="right")~x) for a censored regression. Could anybody who's had experience of this, confirm whether I'm in the ballpark? Grateful thanks Andrew Barnes ======================================= Dr Andrew Barnes Agricultural Management Economist Modelling and Strategy Group Land Economy Research Department Research Division SAC West Mains Road Edinburgh EH9 3JG Tel: 0131 535 4042 E.Mail: A.Barnes at ed.sac.ac.uk...

...rying to gauge the amount of overhead for idle users (NOT in the middle of a phone call) per user, per server. These are a combination of SIP and IAX2 clients, with "qualify=yes". On, for example, a dual 2.4 Ghz Pentium server (with plenty of RAM), how many hundreds, or thousands (rough ballpark) of clients can be supported? Again, these are mostly idle, and I'm interested in a calculation of idle users (with qualify=yes), not # of simultaneous calls. Thank you for any ballparks anyone might provide, Bryan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... U...

...is the relative size of LLVM bitcode files and the corresponding native binaries? Are there significant differences between targets (e.g. x86, ARM, Thumb,...) 2) What is the relative performance of code generated by LLVM and gcc respectively? I am not looking for exact answers, rough ballpark figures are quite sufficient. -- Pertti

...o use for an Asterisk install. The CPU is a 64-bit AMD Opteron 246, 2Gb RAM. We're having some compilation issues with some of the Asterisk modules using Debian-amd64, and due to time constraints we are considering going 32-bit for now just to get the box up and running. Does anyone have any ballpark figures for the performance differences between Asterisk on 32-bit and 64-bit platforms? What kind of hit could we expect? Thanks. Regards, Austin. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes De...

yujiageng734 wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to use your gdbsx. But I don''t know how to make a 32bit > dom0 running on 64bit hypervisor. Can you explain this for me? I''m > extremely grateful to you. Hmm.. good question. I don''t know, it''s always done for me here. One option would be to just download OVM from edelivery.oracle.com,

...:02, David Green via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello > > A 4.4% geomean codesize improvement is really impressive. That stuff is hard to come by, you usually have to nibble away at it bit at a time. I ran some codesize benchmarks we have and they were in the same ballpark. Some of these are quite small so had less opportunity for outlining, but the average was still over 3% with some as high as 9-10%. > > All the tests I ran were fine, although we don't have a lot of -Oz AArch64 testing. I made the same experiments during the last weeks inside Linaro and...

...s to get something rolling. I think we should start with something informal to get to know each other and see what our interests are etc. So, I've created a poll with a random slice of March here [1], so we can sync on the date / time. Please pick as many options as you can. The times are just ballpark estimates, I'm trying to cover different scenarios in case people have to take trains or have other constraints. Just pick whatever's closer to what you prefer, and we'll settle on something more specific later on. If you can't make it, please say so and we can try to do this in Apr...

Hi all, I would like to estimate power and necessary sample size for a GLM with a response variable that has a poisson distribution. Do you have any suggestions for how I can do this in R? Thank you for your help. Sincerely, Craig -- Craig A. Faulhaber Department of Forest, Range, and Wildlife Sciences Utah State University 5230 Old Main Hill Logan, UT 84322 (435)797-3892

...[painscore] => 0.001342585 [Offset] => -0.546520621809327 The mean of painscore is 741. It seems to me that for center=FALSE, mboost should modify the intercept by subtracting 741*0.007553608 from it (thus intercept should = -11.285). If I manually do this, the output is credible, and in the ballpark of that given by other methods (e.g., lrm or glm with a Binomial link function). If I don't do this, then the inverse logistic interpretation of the output is off by orders of magnitude. In the end, with "center=TRUE", and I want to make a prediction based on the coefficients returne...

...the operating system interface so that XPL can be ported to many platforms. You're actually going one step further and abstracting the hardware. This is totally cool! > > Please note that the Linux kernel project is still in its infancy and > won't be done for awhile. :) Any ballpark ideas on when an alpha version could be available? Are we talking months or years here? > > In the meantime, there are still things you can do. Please see below... > > > > > What is the alternative? Write a library function in C and have it > > called by LLVM? >...

...inutes. It then changes to a load of 3 and a runtime of 147 minutes (not quite double). If nothing is plugged in, do you get a load of 0? If so, consider that the control electronics will require a certain amount of current from the battery just to keep the output running, and it may be in the same ballpark as a load of 3-6%. > > Bear in mind the precision and accuracy of these measurements are not guaranteed by the vendor. Two points may determine a line, but this is an inverse relationship, so a small change in load means a larger change in runtime. You could add a dummy load and see if it tr...