search for: balloting

Hello, I think this is an easy one for the average Rails developer but I''m a bit stuck. I''m creating a simple voting app: any user can create a survey, with any number of questions, and other users can then vote by creating a ballot for that survey. Here''s the modeling: class Survey < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :questions has_many :eligibilities has_many

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 3:05 AM Jan Sjodin <jan_sjodin at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > for (...) { > > ballot(); > > if (... /* non-uniform */) continue; > > } > > > > into > > > > for (...) { > > do { > > ballot(); > > } while (... /* non-uniform */); > > } > > I'm not sure if I follow

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 9:09 PM Jan Sjodin <jan_sjodin at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) { > > foo = ballot(true); // ballot 1 > > > > if (threadID /* ID of the thread within a wavefront/warp */ % 2 == 0) continue; > > > > bar = ballot(true); // ballot 2 > > } > > > > versus: > > > > int i =

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 7:20 AM Jan Sjodin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > > > > for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) { > > > > foo = ballot(true); // ballot 1 > > > > > > > > if (threadID /* ID of the thread within a wavefront/warp */ % 2 > == 0) continue; > > > > > > > > bar =

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 4:20 PM Jan Sjodin <jan_sjodin at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) { > > > > foo = ballot(true); // ballot 1 > > > > > > > > if (threadID /* ID of the thread within a wavefront/warp */ % 2 > == 0) continue; > > > > > > > > bar = ballot(true); //

Strong agree with Mehdi, I am also not really sure what is the proposal at this point so it's hard to comment further. > There are a number of questions that I have. Do we need better machine descriptions so that various resources can be considered? Do we need the capability to reason about the machine state for the cross-lane operations to enable more optimizations? Are intrinsics the

On 31.01.19 15:59, Jan Sjodin wrote: >> >  Any transform that re-arranges control flow would potentially have to >> >  know about the properties of ballot(), and the rules with respect to >> >  the CFG (and maybe consider the target) to know where to insert the >> >  intrinsics. > >> But the same is true for basically any approach to handling this. In

I don't see how this would fix the continue vs. nested loop problem I explained earlier. That is, how would this prevent turning: for (...) { ballot(); if (... /* non-uniform */) continue; } into for (...) { do { ballot(); } while (... /* non-uniform */); } and vice versa? Note that there's no duplication going on here, and the single-threaded flow of control is

On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 4:44 PM Jan Sjodin <jan_sjodin at yahoo.com> wrote: > > The reason I'm looking for solutions that can work without "scanning the > > code" or "spooky action at a distance" is that we should have a solution > > that's easily digestible by folks who are not aware of GPU execution > models. > > > > The fallback

On 20.12.18 18:03, Connor Abbott wrote: > We already have the notion of "convergent" functions like > syncthreads(), to which we cannot add control-flow dependencies. > That is, it's legal to hoist syncthreads out of an "if", but it's > not legal to sink it into an "if".  It's not clear to me why we > can't have

Hi all, LLVM needs a solution to the long-standing problem that the IR is unable to express certain semantics expected by high-level programming languages that target GPUs. Solving this issue is necessary both for upstream use of LLVM as a compiler backend for GPUs and for correctly supporting LLVM IR <-> SPIR-V roundtrip translation. It may also be useful for compilers targeting

When I do remote form submits through jQuery .submit() why do I sometimes have to refresh the page manually to see the results? My jQuery handler is very simple: $("#vote_yes").click(function() { $("#approval").val(true) $(".edit_vote").submit() }); And the link that leverages this bit of code is as follows: <%= link_to("Vote

The preliminary round voting is completed in the "2005 Readers' Choice Awards" at Linux Journal. CentOS was nominated in the "distribution:" category along with 18 other Linux distros ... and we finished in the top 3 (along with Ubuntu and FedoraCore). Thanks to every one who voted for CentOS. I really did not expect that we would be on the final ballot, though I am

Does anyone know if there is a Smartnet contract or whatnot available from Cisco for access to the latest 7920 images? I've got one w/ asterisk that is exhibiting a few of the documented bugs running 1.0.3 (1.0.7 is the latest IIRC). Thanks! -- /* Ian A. Underwood - agentgrn@dcne.net - http://www.agentgreen.org There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot,

Greetings people; The section of drakeconf that pclos uses has two problems. First is several screens full of complaints about deprecated syntax in "/etc/udev/rules.d/70-nut-usbups.rules" at each reboot. So I pulled the current 2.5 svn trunk, then found I was missing quite a few build tools needed here that aren't used when building a kernel, currently running a 32 bit

gene heskett <gheskett at shentel.net> writes: > Which file in the nut I pulled a month ago, should I start with to get > the new version actually running? I still get - -V=2.7.4 It is likely that you have built new nut but old nut is still on your system. I do a 'sudo make install' to write over the distribution nut (on NetBSD/pkgsrc, surely not what you are using).

On Monday 22 June 2020 09:50:50 Larry Fahnoe wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 8:27 AM Gene Heskett <gheskett at shentel.net> wrote: > > > On Jun 22, 2020, at 8:52 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > pi at rpi4:~ $ upscmd myups *test.battery.start.quick* > > > > Username (pi): > > > > Password: > > > > Unexpected response from upsd:

Hi Jean-Marc, Alfred and Greg, Are you receiving the mails from IETF about draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex The mails are not coming from AVT mailing list, but I think we are all 3 part of a minimal list (draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex at tools.ietf.org) dedicated to latest discussion about the draft. I have answered some questions, but there are small changes and adaptation still required to the ietf

But /etc/nut/upsmon.conf has the correct username and password. returns: gene at coyote:/usr/share/doc/nut-doc/pdf$ upsmon myups at localhost Network UPS Tools upsmon 2.6.4 kill: Operation not permitted /etc/nut/upsmon.conf line 75: invalid directive [*****] /etc/nut/upsmon.conf line 76: invalid directive password = ************** /etc/nut/upsmon.conf line 77: invalid directive upsmon master UPS:

Greetings Jim & friends; Just installed nut 2.7.4 on a debian bullseye system. ups is: Bus 001 Device 006: ID 051d:0003 American Power Conversion UPS Device Descriptor: bLength 18 bDescriptorType 1 bcdUSB 2.00 bDeviceClass 0 bDeviceSubClass 0 bDeviceProtocol 0 bMaxPacketSize0 64 idVendor