Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "ballison".
Did you mean:
allison
2024 Jan 31
1
Behavior of acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes on a share
Problem solved (I hope)!
On 31.01.2024 12:40, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote:
> On 1/31/24 12:02, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>> Which looks correct to myself, so a bug ?
> something to look into in more detail, ie logs and network traces. :)
>
> -slow
Hi folks,
I added the following parameter to the share definition in smb.conf:
acl_xattr:default acl style = windows
Now the
2024 Jun 11
1
SeDiskOperatorPrivilege_Privilege
Hey Rowland,
Just wanted to say you are 100% correct, and it does (seemingly) nothing, at least within the context of setting Windows ACLs. I believe I have made a post on here a while ago with the same observation, I will see if I can find it.
For configuring of Windows ACLs, the only thing it initially cares about is the owner user or owner group on the directory you are sharing out. If you
2024 Jan 30
1
Behavior of acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes on a share
Just wanted to say very interesting thread! I would like to share my experience as well if that's alright.
I have noticed when using the ignore system acls = yes value, when checking on the Windows side permissions it appears as the following (copying from Peter here):
-Permissions list-
root (Unix User\root) Full Control This folder only Domain Admins (Private\Domain Admins) Read,