Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "bahrami".
2012 May 18
1
translation
Dear Sir/Madam
I am a BSc student studying statistics in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad,Iran.
Translating R messages to Farsi is my thesis and I have already downloaded *poEdit* to translate those messages.However, the created .mo files for R.pot and RGui.pot are not useful at all.
I would like to be informed if there is something wrong with right-to-left encoding or Farsi fonts or Farsi support.
2008 Oct 21
5
Why could I get function names from a stripped exec?
Hello, all experts.
When I use pid provider, my Dscript with -F option output the codepath with flowindent as you know,
e.g.
-> main
-> f1
-> f2
however I realized that the exec file I used at that time was stripped.
Does anyone know the reason why I could see the function names?
Thanks in advance.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
2020 Nov 18
2
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
...ic section type values and 0x10000000 OS
specific values. The resource is abundant.
On https://groups.google.com/g/generic-abi/c/i2Xio-47QdQ , Cary Coutant
has made an alternative proposal by adding a new section flag.
Personally I prefer a section type a section flag with reasons explained
by Ali Bahrami. People are still arguing but I appreciate that the theme
of the discussion is that people acknowledge the use cases and agree to
use an appropriate ELF-level thing, instead of adding ad-hoc rules to
the linker.
2007 Apr 16
0
[Fwd: Re: Getting the function names?]
Francois Dion wrote:
> Le lundi 16 avril 2007 ? 13:28 -0600, Ali Bahrami a ??crit :
>>> Subject:
>>> Re: [dtrace-discuss] Getting the function names?
>>> From:
>>> Bart Smaalders <bart.smaalders at Sun.COM>
>>> Date:
>>> Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:48:29 -0700
>>> To:
>>> fdion at atriumwindows.com
&g...
2017 Feb 18
2
[lld] Has anybody ever run into the Solaris linker before?
Recently LLD made it to the front page of HN (yay!):
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13670458
This comment about the Solaris linker surprised me:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13672364
"""
> To me, the biggest advantage is cross compiling
Not all system linkers have this problem. For example, Solaris ld(1) is
perfectly capable of cross-linking any valid ELF file.
2020 Nov 18
0
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
...c section type values and 0x10000000 OS
specific values. The resource is abundant.
On https://groups.google.com/g/generic-abi/c/i2Xio-47QdQ , Cary Coutant
has made an alternative proposal by adding a new section flag.
Personally I prefer a section type a section flag with reasons explained
by Ali Bahrami. People are still arguing but I appreciate that the theme
of the discussion is that people acknowledge the use cases and agree to
use an appropriate ELF-level thing, instead of adding ad-hoc rules to
the linker.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <htt...
2020 Nov 17
5
[LLD] Support DWARF64, debug_info "sorting"
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:42 PM Igor Kudrin <ikudrin at accesssoftek.com> wrote:
>
> On 14.11.2020 3:42, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote:
> > For .debug_* in object files:
> >
> > DWARF32 -> SHT_PROGBITS (unchanged)
> > DWARF64 -> SHT_DWARF64 or SHT_GNU_DWARF64
> >
> > In LLD, we will need to allow mixed SHT_PROGBITS and SHT_DWARF64. If
> > all