Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "bagwil".
Did you mean:
bagwill
2003 Nov 04
2
add specify network interface option?
...one, and you want to force traffic
over the fast one. I'm running an older version of AIX that doesn't make it
convenient to change the default interface, and doesn't load-balance over
adapters. Does anyone else think that it would be a useful addition to
rsync too? Thanks.
--
Bob Bagwill <mailto:bagwill@nist.gov>
2011 Apr 29
2
thank you wayne, andrew, paul and everyone else
...'t NEED them so much if we had better distributed file systems,
but let's keep this an upbeat message. :-)
I'd like to thank Andrew and Paul for giving birth to it, Wayne for nurturing it, and
everyone else for providing support through their testing patches, and suggestions.
--
Bob Bagwill
2003 Sep 06
1
prevent simultaneous copies?
...e
try to push stuff out, not knowing the file is already being copied, and
disk space and bandwidth is temporarily wasted. If they are copying big
files to a small filesystem, there's a danger that the two big temp files
may fill up the filesystem, preventing either from completing.
--
Bob Bagwill <mailto:bagwill@nist.gov>
2002 May 22
0
Improving the rsync protocol (RE: Rsync dies)
...#39;s
database, zip through the comparison, compile the transfer list, and
copy away.
I think it's important to distinguish between the ad-hoc rsync'ing of a few
hundred little files, and the carefully planned rsync'ing of a hundred
thousand files containing gigabytes of data.
--
Bob Bagwill <mailto:bagwill@nist.gov>
2007 May 02
1
http as a transport for rsync?
Given the increasing reliance on proxies and filtering devices, it is
harder and harder to rsync across the net. Do you think we will ever
be able to use http as a transport for rsync? For example, when will
I be able to do this:
rsync -arv http://rsync.domain.tld/webroot
It would seem that this is the logical next step for rsync and is the
one feature I most desparately need. What
2007 May 09
3
rsync mechanics question
Hey All,
I've been using rsync (2.6.9) to migrate a 90g message store volume and
I'm running into some interesting results. I have two FC storage arrays
attached to a Sunfire V280R, running Solaris 8. My 100gig volume is on a
Sun StoreEdge 3510, and my new 500gig partition is on an HP EVA.
I used the syntax: rsync -a --stats --delete $SRC/$dir/ $DST/$dir
At present time, the
2006 Jul 06
3
Max number of files to transfer
Hey,
Is it possible to make rsync only transfer a maximum amount of files at
one time. I want to do this to make the initial set up time of the
filelist before transfer to be reasonably predictable.
Rsync is basically going to transfer from one mailbox to another mailbox
but I want to be able to only transfer say 50 files at a time. I know
this can be solved by controlling the number of
2006 Jul 06
3
Max number of files to transfer
Hey,
Is it possible to make rsync only transfer a maximum amount of files at
one time. I want to do this to make the initial set up time of the
filelist before transfer to be reasonably predictable.
Rsync is basically going to transfer from one mailbox to another mailbox
but I want to be able to only transfer say 50 files at a time. I know
this can be solved by controlling the number of
2008 Feb 11
5
Need ideas for project
Hey everyone,
I am a final semester MCA student. I've chosen rsync as the subject of my
project for my graduation. Hence I would appreciate it if someone could
guide me with some ideas on how I can contribute to rsync. I will work hard
to implement whatever suggestions that you can all give me.
I would definitely like to know what are some of the issues concerning
rsync. May be I can then