search for: baettenhausen

...e have a very much to old Samba DC (Version 4.1.x) and a new Samba 4.5.6 which should act as a member server. The first problem we had during joining the domain: "net ads join -k" didn't work. The Error Message said: Failed to join domain: failed to lookup DC info for domain 'BAETTENHAUSEN.LOCAL' over rpc: An internal error occurred. Joining with "net ads join -S s4ad.baettenhausen.local -U Administrator at baettenhausen.local" worked. After this it wasn't possible to connect to any share of this server. I found the following message in the logs: [2017/03/18 01...

...blem. >> >> We have a very much to old Samba DC (Version 4.1.x) and a new Samba >> 4.5.6 which should act as a member server. > Don't suppose you can update the DC to a newer Samba version ? I know, I have to.... > > >> smbclient -L 127.0.0.1 -U administrator at baettenhausen.local >> Enter administrator at baettenhausen.local's password: >> session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE >> > You should be able to fix this by adding this line to smb.conf: > > username map = /etc/samba/user.map > > Then create the user.map: > &...

...Enterprise 11SP3 with bind 9.9.4P2 and the Sernet samba packages in version 4.1.7. samba works as AD PDC. Every few days our bind dns server denies updates. It looks like a problem with kerberos and the bind_dlz driver: Jul 2 08:04:21 s4ad named[22579]: samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone baettenhausen.local Jul 2 08:04:21 s4ad named[22579]: client 192.168.1.199#50938: update 'baettenhausen.local/IN' denied Jul 2 08:04:21 s4ad named[22579]: samba_dlz: cancelling transaction on zone baettenhausen.local Jul 2 08:04:21 s4ad named[22579]: tsig.c:228: INSIST((tkey->ring->lru).head...

Hello, one of my S4 ADs shows a strange behavior. The Server is a stand-alone ad controller with bind (bind_dlz) as dns-server. The Samba Version is 4.1.2 running on SLES11 SP3. If i add a new A-record with the DNS-Tool from the Microsoft remote-server-tools an check the box "verkn?pften PTR-Eintrag erstellen", it creates the A-Record, but not the pointer-record. If i join the