Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "badnwidth".
Did you mean:
bad_width
2004 Aug 06
1
new features request
...ity in handling bandwidth.
> tcp/ip packets can be marked with iptables and then ran threw tc which you
> could then prioritize your packets
You mean by using STRING matching which is experimental and a thing I
would never do in kernel (otherwise I dont see how you will do mountpoint
based badnwidth management).
Still it doesnt solve the problem I raised. With QoS you will shape by
lowering stream rates, which is something you never want for streams.
- --
Mihai RUSU Email: dizzy@roedu.net
GPG : http://dizzy.roedu.net/dizzy-gpg.txt WWW: http://dizzy.roe...
2005 Jun 17
3
Bandwidth monitoring tool
..., I`d like to debug it by
myself - but I was not able to find a tool that allow me to
monitor current bandwidth usage per port (and preferably even per port+ip).
I want to know what is the current bandwidth passing through port 80
(all connections), and in port 80, I`d like to
know what is the badnwidth usage per IP (regardless of the number of
sockets that are opened from that IP).
anyone?
thanks.
Omry.
2004 Apr 07
2
Problems with ADIT 600 - latency, loss, etc
...claims that using data at high speed will overload
the CPU causing dropped calls. Computers connect at 100mbit ethernet -
unsure what he wants me to do here. I call BS on this one, and in fact
did, with silence as the response.
- I have enabled packet queueing in my firewall, with a max outbound
badnwidth of the T1 speed. This enables me to also monitor my realtime
usage in 5 second polls. While pushing out around 300kbit (on a T1), the
voice call I was on was choppy, and I had packet latency. 1.5Mbit or
300kbit seems to yield the same results.
- It happens consistently, even in low-usage times....
2004 Aug 06
2
new features request
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Dave St John wrote:
> > > > Another nice feature to add would be a "bandwidth" limit (so just a
> new
> > > > <limit> type entry).
> If you are running icecast2 on linux you can handle bandwidth limitations
> using QoS
> more specificly iproute2.
You mistunderstood me. No, I