search for: badidx

...ata frame and a set of criteria to filter points out. My procedure is to always locate indices of those points, check if index vector length is greater than 0 or not and then remove them. Meaning dftest <- data.frame(x=rnorm(100),y=rnorm(100)); qtile <- quantile(dftest$x,probs=c(0.05,0.95)); badIdx <- which((dftest$x < qtile[1]) | (dftest$x > qtile[2])); if (length(badIdx) > 0) { dftest <- dftest[-idx,]; } My question is that is there a more streamlined way to achieve this? Thank you. Cheers, Robert

...ggregateCopy SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-03-15-IndirectGoto SingleSource/Regression/C/2005-05-06-LongLongSignedShift SingleSource/Regression/C/2008-01-07-LongDouble SingleSource/Regression/C++/2008-01-29-ParamAliasesReturn SingleSource/Regression/C++/2011-03-28-Bitfield SingleSource/Regression/C/badidx SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack SingleSource/Regression/C++/BuiltinTypeInfo SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs SingleSource/Regression/C/casts SingleSource/Regression/C/compare SingleSource/Regression/C/ConstructorDestructorAttributes SingleSource/Regression/C/DuffsDevice SingleSource/Regression...

...ngleSource/Regression/C/pointer_arithmetic | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-22-VarSizeArray | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/badidx | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/uint64_to_float | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/test_indvars | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-10-12-GlobalVarInitialize...

...0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/PR640 | 0.0083 1464 0.0068 * 0.0066 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/badidx | 0.0034 848 0.0043 * 0.0041 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack | 0.0172 3328 0.0153 *...

...0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/PR640 | 0.0040 1504 0.0080 * 0.0040 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/badidx | 0.0040 888 0.0080 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack | 0.0160 3312 0.0080 *...

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

...0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/PR640 | 0.0074 1516 0.0112 * 0.0111 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/badidx | 0.0089 880 0.0041 * 0.0040 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack | 0.0197 3300 0.0138 *...

...0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/PR640 | 0.0061 3488 0.0070 * 0.0068 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/badidx | 0.0016 908 0.0021 * 0.0021 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack | 0.0066 3160 0.0066 *...

...      0.01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/PR640                                          | > 0.0100 2076     0.0100      *                0.0100      |    0.01    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.02 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/badidx                                         | > 0.0100 1012     0.0000      *                0.0000      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack                                       | > 0.0000 4820     0.0200      *...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

...- n/a n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/ > PR640 | 0.0100 2076 > 0.0100 * 0.0100 | 0.01 0.00 0.00 > * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/ > badidx | 0.0100 1012 > 0.0000 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 > * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/ > bigstack | 0.0000 4820 &gt...

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability

....ll 2 86459 0 0.02 86433 0 0.02 86433 assem.ll 1 14439 0 0.01 14409 0 0.01 14409 assign.ll 10 62051 0 0.02 62028 0 0.02 62028 atalloc.ll 3 11357 0 0.01 11323 0 0.01 11323 atax.ll 12 23916 0 0.01 23868 0 0.01 23868 AtomicOps.ll 2 5132 0 0.01 5123 0 0.01 5123 atop.ll 1 12901 0 0.01 12874 0 0.01 12874 badidx.ll 2 5030 0 0.01 5018 0 0.01 5018 basicmath.ll 1 27788 0 0.01 27750 0 0.01 27750 Bcj2Coder.ll 29 231916 0 0.03 231882 0 0.03 231882 Bcj2Register.ll 3 8684 0 0.01 8650 0 0.01 8650 BcjCoder.ll 10 12616 2 0.01 12616 0 0.01 12582 BcjRegister.ll 3 3398 0 0.01 3364 0 0.01 3364 bc.ll 1 125465 0 0.02 12544...