search for: bad_network_name

H! I am getting such messages in log.samba: ../source4/nbt_server/dgram netlogon.c:198(nbtd_mailslot_netlogon_handler) nbtd netlogon handler failed from 192.168.0.125:138 to DOMAIN<1c> - NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME What means that <1c>? seems like special char... There are two domains sharing one network - one - NT-style named DOMAIN and the second, AD, named DOMAIN2 (samba 4.2.0/slack64-14.1) Janis

...as the case may be) as the logged in user. So, how can I tell whether I've correctly joined the domain? The second part of this is that with each of two shares (<share1> and <share2>), set up as below (I've only used bandwidth on one share; their set up is identical), I get BAD_NETWORK_NAME from an smbclient //<server>/<share1> -U <user> call. With valid user set to @group in <share1> only, this changes to a bad login error (ACCESS_DENIED) for that share. However, when logged in on the PC as root, I get into <share2> (which does not have @group set)...

...hares are as below. drwx------ 2 test1 users 4096 2009-12-11 12:42 test1 drwx------ 2 Test2 users 4096 2009-12-11 12:41 Test2 I am using RTSM SDK for accessing the shares. I am able to access share "test1" as user "test1". But when accessing "Test2" I am receiving a BAD_NETWORK_NAME error. Below is the output of log.smbd file : 2009/12/11 12:39:15, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(1160) '/hsrv/samba/shares/test1' does not exist or permission denied when connecting to [test1] Error was No such file or directory [2009/12/11 12:39:15, 0] smbd/service.c:make_co...

...specified on mount. Default has changed to a more secure dialect, SMB2.1 or later (e.g. SMB3), from CIFS (SMB1). To use the less secure SMB1 dialect to access old servers which do not support SMB3 (or SMB2.1) specify vers=1.0 on mount. Sep 5 12:38:11 pc1labinf17 kernel: [ 322.015963] CIFS VFS: BAD_NETWORK_NAME: \\fileserver.ad.domain.test\Users Sep 5 12:38:11 pc1labinf17 kernel: [ 322.016188] CIFS VFS: \\fileserver.ad.domain.test\IPC$ ioctl error in smb2_get_dfs_refer rc=-22 Sep 5 12:38:11 pc1labinf17 kernel: [ 322.016522] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -2 clearly i've tried some...

Folks, I'm having a problem connecting to some shares, and not to others. I'm running SUSE 9.3 and Samba 3.0.22pre1 with a Win2k PC on one subnet and an XP laptop on a separate subnet. The problem is that with three shares out of eight, I get a "tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME" error message; I get appropriate accesses to the remaining five. Googling the error message and searching the HOWTO didn't turn up any solutions, only the statement that this error generally meant that the share was badly formed. Following are the tests I've run that have failed...

...naging a LAN with an XP laptop and a Win2k PC). Samba has joined the domain and is the PDC, winbindd is running, wins support = yes. The first problem is that, while I can get to some shares (e.g., home directory, printers, netlogon, profiles), others I cannot get to--I just get back NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME. These non-connecting shares are owned by a user and a group (of course), and the users trying to connect are members of the owning group. Googling, and checking the archives here turn up others with this problem, but no solutions. Tests I've run exploring this include: smbstatu...

...e explain what is the use of the "Canonicalized pathname" bit in the SMB header's flags field. How is it handled by linux samba server. What are the implications of this bit being set or not set?? I am facing a problem accessing a share on Linux server using rtsmb cifs library. I get BAD_NETWORK_NAME error and the share access fails. But the same share access passes when directly accessed from Windows using "net use". I observed the ethereal packet capture, and the only difference found was that, when accessed through windows the "Canonicalized pathname" bit is set and when...

...anged to a more > secure dialect, SMB2.1 or later (e.g. SMB3), from CIFS > (SMB1). To use the less secure SMB1 dialect to access old > servers which do not support SMB3 (or SMB2.1) specify > vers=1.0 on mount. > Sep 5 12:38:11 pc1labinf17 kernel: [ 322.015963] CIFS VFS: > BAD_NETWORK_NAME: \\fileserver.ad.domain.test\Users > Sep 5 12:38:11 pc1labinf17 kernel: [ 322.016188] CIFS VFS: > \\fileserver.ad.domain.test\IPC$ ioctl error in > smb2_get_dfs_refer rc=-22 > Sep 5 12:38:11 pc1labinf17 kernel: [ 322.016522] CIFS VFS: > cifs_mount failed w/return code = -2 &...

...E 9.3 with Samba 3.0.21a, but I can't connect to some shares, even though I can connect to others just fine. I get into my home share, netlogon share, printer shares, etc, but three shares all get me the same answer in response to <smbclient -L //server/share>: I get back an NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME error. All users are correctly in passdb, passwd, etc. I have winbind running, WINS Support=Yes, Samba is set as a PDC (I think--Preferred Master=Yes). Googling the error message and searching the HOWTO didn't turn up any solutions, only the statement that this error generally meant that...

...rectory mode = 0755 guest ok = Yes When I try to check the share OAF with the smbclient command it work fine [root@oafsvr ~]# smbclient //OAFSVR/oaf -UPaulo Password: Domain=[OAF_ADMIN] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.23-1.fc4] smb: \> exit but when try to check the share ISO9000 I receive BAD_NETWORK_NAME error: [root@oafsvr ~]# smbclient //OAFSVR/ISO9000 -UPaulo Password: Domain=[OAF_ADMIN] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.23-1.fc4] tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME the only difference between the two directories is the oaf is path on root device and /u02 is path of different partition. s...

...st at lists.samba.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > samba-owner at lists.samba.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of samba digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. BAD_NETWORK_NAME (jd at ionica.lv) > 2. Samba 4 join AD by samba (Krutskikh Ivan) > 3. Re: Samba 4 join AD by samba (L.P.H. van Belle) > 4. Re: BAD_NETWORK_NAME (L.P.H. van Belle) > 5. winbindd: Failed to fetch our own, local AD domain join > password for winbindd's internal use...

Hi, I can't get access to any shares when running "smbclient //DUCK/test -U Dominic". I'm getting the message: tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME I'm pretty sure it's authenticating properly as it says "session setup ok" in the debug output. If I enter the wrong password I get: "session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE" I'm running CentOS 5.4 with the following samba packages samba-common-3.0.33-3.15.e...

...st at lists.samba.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > samba-owner at lists.samba.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of samba digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. BAD_NETWORK_NAME (jd at ionica.lv) > 2. Samba 4 join AD by samba (Krutskikh Ivan) > 3. Re: Samba 4 join AD by samba (L.P.H. van Belle) > 4. Re: BAD_NETWORK_NAME (L.P.H. van Belle) > 5. winbindd: Failed to fetch our own, local AD domain join > password for winbindd's internal use...