search for: backupusers

Hello, yesterday i posted this issue on snapshot-discuss at listsourceforge.net (subject: wondering why backup wont start), but after reading the FAQ and searching the bugzilla DB i thought it could help to post here as well. i have a problem. But let me first describe my setup. i followed this howto: http://dev.kprod.net/?q=linux-backup-rsnapshot-no-root Now there is a backup server rpi-home

Hello guys, sorry for cross-posting, but imho it could be an error in my rsnapshot setup as well as in my rsync setup. If there is a solution on one of these mailing-lists i will post it to the other one as well. ok? here is my question: when running rsnapshot, my exclude filter is being ignored, but i don't see why. grep -v "#" /etc/rsnapshot-debx40.conf | grep . gives

I've been working at this for a few days now and I can't figure out what is broken. Google turns up similar issues from years back, but I hope this is a bug resurfacing. ACL entries are being deleted when files are saved. Here is an example: username: user1 group membership: Domain Users directory: /share/test file: test.xls getfacl /share # file: share # owner: DOMAIN+backupuser #

Hey, I'm using rsync to backup my server but there is a problem because rsync is using very huge amounts traffic. But first to the setup. The server I backup has 4GB of data and I use the following command to backup this data. /usr/bin/rsync -aze 'ssh -i /root/.ssh/backup.key -l backupuser' --rsync-path='sudo rsync' --delete --exclude-from=ex.list $SRC $TRG The problem is

Hi, I am experiencing segfaults when transferring files via rsync though sudo. Setup: - Backupserver initiates the rsync command with --delete -vvv --no-inc-recursive --numeric-ids --delete-excluded --relative --rsync-path=/home/backupuser/rsync-wrapper.sh - rsync-wrapper.sh (on the client) contains /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/rsync "$@"; - user "backupuser" has sudo access to the

Hi Roland, Thanks for the reply. Memory usage on both machines seem fine. The server has 4GB's of RAM, of which about 3GB is used during the file list build and about 1.5GB is used during the actual transfer. The client has 16GB of RAM with a peak usage of 8.5GB. I just tried three transfers in a row and it consistently breaks at a certain point, after which I get the "ERROR: out of

Yes, I removed "--no-inc-recursive", without success. -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Aron Rotteveel 2015-03-27 12:24 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Have you tried removing --no-inc-recursive yet? > > On 03/27/2015 07:19 AM, Aron Rotteveel wrote: > > Hi Roland, > > >

the man page for vncviewer presents the -via gateway option to use ssh through a gateway. I understand if I want a secure vnc connection to server.foo.com I can use the command: vncviewer localhost -via server.foo.com But I have moved my SSHD services from port 22 to port n. So according to the man pages, I need an environment variable of VNC_VIA_CMD and override the default command with:

# The first error rsync: generator.c:1867: check_for_finished_files: Assertion `flist != ((void *)0)' failed. rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes [receiver]: Broken pipe (32) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(1493) [receiver=3.0.0pre2] # Sample command, obfuscated to protect the guilty rsync --archive --hard-links --no-motd \ --numeric-ids

...m managing the rsyncd.conf file. Either way > the server side command would be forced and no other ssh > functionality > would be allowed. <snip> > I am thinking of something like this with in sshd_config with > whichever ForceCommand they would pick: > > Match Group backupusers > X11Forwarding no > AllowTcpForwarding no > ForceCommand /usr/bin/rsync --server --daemon . > ForceCommand /usr/bin/rrsync-wrapper > > Note that a wrapper or modification would be needed for rrsync since > sshd_config doesn't support %u or %h in ForceCommand :( I...

Hi. My goal is to use rsync to syncronize box1 and box2. On box2, I have a tapedrive which I write the data I syncronize from box1 every night. On box1, my /etc/rsyncd.conf looks like this: root@box1# cat /etc/rsyncd.conf max connections = 1 syslog facility = local6 [tmp] path = /tmp read only = yes comment = export of /tmp hosts allow = box2 auth users

On 10/15/07, Erik Jan Tromp <betageek@sympatico.ca> wrote: > # The second error > Invalid file index: -101 (-1 - 0) with iflags 0 [receiver] > rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at rsync.c(273) [receiver=3.0.0pre2] > rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (21 bytes received so far) [generator] > rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(596)

Hi I use rsync for daily backups from a mailserver. Every day the mailserver pushes backup to the backupserver. Cron runs the command: rsync -q -zrlpt --specials --chmod=Du+rwx \ --rsh 'ssh -F /root/ssh/config -i /root/ssh/private.key -o UserKnownHostsFile=/root/ssh/known_hosts' \ --files-from=/root/include \ --exclude-from=/root/exclude \ --link-dest=../previous \ /

On 01/04/2023 16:15, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >> >> The problem is, you shouldn't really have Linux groups per se, you >> should have Windows groups that are also Linux groups i.e. everything >> is in AD. > > That's not a great idea. It would mean I'd have to modify every Linux > system. Possibly > And can Linux groups even have a domain let

from a security perspective this is bad. think of a backup provider who wants to make rsyncd modules available to the end users so they can push backups to the server. do you think that such server is secure if all users are allowed to open up an ssh shell to secure their rsync transfer ? ok, you can restrict the ssh connection, but you open up a hole and you need to think twice to make it secure

...rsyncd over ssh would be that the provider would manage > the rsyncd.conf files (1 per user) and could make a web UI to control > certain aspects of it. > > I am thinking of something like this with in sshd_config with > whichever ForceCommand they would pick: > > Match Group backupusers > X11Forwarding no > AllowTcpForwarding no > ForceCommand /usr/bin/rsync --server --daemon . > ForceCommand /usr/bin/rrsync-wrapper > > Note that a wrapper or modification would be needed for rrsync since > sshd_config doesn't support %u or %h in ForceCommand :( &g...

Just a quick heads up to say I'm still getting this (reproducable) error while doing daily backups: rsync: generator.c:1872: check_for_finished_files: Assertion `flist != ((void *)0)' failed. rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes [receiver]: Broken pipe (32) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(1500) [receiver=3.0.0pre2] This is with cvs

Hi all, I have a problem with my Dovecot installation. First, some informations: - OS: CentOS 6.5 x86_64 - Dovecot: dovecot-2.0.9-7.el6.x86_64 Config: mail_location = sdbox:~/dbox user_query = SELECT username, password, 'vmail' as uid, 'vmail' as gid, '/var/vmail/%d/%n' as home, CONCAT('*:storage=', (quota DIV 1000)) as quota_rule FROM mailbox WHERE

Hello! I have a consistent, reproducable failure performing an rsync of an RHEL4 system running rsync in daemon mode with iptables enabled. With iptables disabled, or with a rule that explicitly allows all traffic, the rsync completes. However, with iptalbes enabled, the rsync starts, but will not finish. It fails after copying a seemingly random amount of data. I have been able to

...e already used to. The benefit of rsyncd over ssh would be that the provider would manage the rsyncd.conf files (1 per user) and could make a web UI to control certain aspects of it. I am thinking of something like this with in sshd_config with whichever ForceCommand they would pick: Match Group backupusers X11Forwarding no AllowTcpForwarding no ForceCommand /usr/bin/rsync --server --daemon . ForceCommand /usr/bin/rrsync-wrapper Note that a wrapper or modification would be needed for rrsync since sshd_config doesn't support %u or %h in ForceCommand :( On 12/03/2014 02:20 PM, devzero at...