search for: backup_slave

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20 matches for "backup_slave".

2018 Apr 09
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...can be done in bypass module >for 3 netdev scenario. Just let me undestand it clearly. What I expect the difference would be between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: 2netdev: bypass_master / / VF_slave 3netdev: bypass_master / \ / \ VF_slave backup_slave Is that correct? If not, how does it look like? Thanks!
2018 Apr 09
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...can be done in bypass module >for 3 netdev scenario. Just let me undestand it clearly. What I expect the difference would be between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: 2netdev: bypass_master / / VF_slave 3netdev: bypass_master / \ / \ VF_slave backup_slave Is that correct? If not, how does it look like? Thanks!
2018 Apr 10
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...erence would be >> between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: >> 2netdev: >> bypass_master >> / >> / >> VF_slave >> >> 3netdev: >> bypass_master >> / \ >> / \ >> VF_slave backup_slave >> >> Is that correct? If not, how does it look like? >> >> >Looks correct. >VF_slave and backup_slave are the original netdevs and are present in both the models. >In the 3 netdev model, bypass_master netdev is created and VF_slave and backup_slave are >marke...
2018 Apr 10
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...erence would be >> between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: >> 2netdev: >> bypass_master >> / >> / >> VF_slave >> >> 3netdev: >> bypass_master >> / \ >> / \ >> VF_slave backup_slave >> >> Is that correct? If not, how does it look like? >> >> >Looks correct. >VF_slave and backup_slave are the original netdevs and are present in both the models. >In the 3 netdev model, bypass_master netdev is created and VF_slave and backup_slave are >marke...
2018 Apr 10
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...bypass_master >> > > / >> > > / >> > > VF_slave >> > > >> > > 3netdev: >> > > bypass_master >> > > / \ >> > > / \ >> > > VF_slave backup_slave >> > > >> > > Is that correct? If not, how does it look like? >> > > >> > > >> > Looks correct. >> > VF_slave and backup_slave are the original netdevs and are present in both the models. >> > In the 3 netdev model, bypas...
2018 Apr 10
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...bypass_master >> > > / >> > > / >> > > VF_slave >> > > >> > > 3netdev: >> > > bypass_master >> > > / \ >> > > / \ >> > > VF_slave backup_slave >> > > >> > > Is that correct? If not, how does it look like? >> > > >> > > >> > Looks correct. >> > VF_slave and backup_slave are the original netdevs and are present in both the models. >> > In the 3 netdev model, bypas...
2018 Apr 10
3
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
.../ >> > > > > VF_slave >> > > > > >> > > > > 3netdev: >> > > > > bypass_master >> > > > > / \ >> > > > > / \ >> > > > > VF_slave backup_slave >> > > > > >> > > > > Is that correct? If not, how does it look like? >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Looks correct. >> > > > VF_slave and backup_slave are the original netdevs and are present in...
2018 Apr 10
3
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
.../ >> > > > > VF_slave >> > > > > >> > > > > 3netdev: >> > > > > bypass_master >> > > > > / \ >> > > > > / \ >> > > > > VF_slave backup_slave >> > > > > >> > > > > Is that correct? If not, how does it look like? >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Looks correct. >> > > > VF_slave and backup_slave are the original netdevs and are present in...
2018 Apr 09
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...t me undestand it clearly. What I expect the difference would be > between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: > 2netdev: > bypass_master > / > / > VF_slave > > 3netdev: > bypass_master > / \ > / \ > VF_slave backup_slave > > Is that correct? If not, how does it look like? > > Looks correct. VF_slave and backup_slave are the original netdevs and are present in both the models. In the 3 netdev model, bypass_master netdev is created and VF_slave and backup_slave are marked as the 2 slaves of this new netde...
2018 Apr 11
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...> > > > >> > > > > > > 3netdev: >> > > > > > > bypass_master >> > > > > > > / \ >> > > > > > > / \ >> > > > > > > VF_slave backup_slave >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Is that correct? If not, how does it look like? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Looks correct. >> > > > > > VF_slave...
2018 Apr 11
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...> > > > >> > > > > > > 3netdev: >> > > > > > > bypass_master >> > > > > > > / \ >> > > > > > > / \ >> > > > > > > VF_slave backup_slave >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Is that correct? If not, how does it look like? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Looks correct. >> > > > > > VF_slave...
2018 Apr 11
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...t; > > > 3netdev: >> > > > > > > > > bypass_master >> > > > > > > > > / \ >> > > > > > > > > / \ >> > > > > > > > > VF_slave backup_slave >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Is that correct? If not, how does it look like? >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Looks co...
2018 Apr 11
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...t; > > > 3netdev: >> > > > > > > > > bypass_master >> > > > > > > > > / \ >> > > > > > > > > / \ >> > > > > > > > > VF_slave backup_slave >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Is that correct? If not, how does it look like? >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Looks co...
2018 Apr 10
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...dev model is this: >>> 2netdev: >>> bypass_master >>> / >>> / >>> VF_slave >>> >>> 3netdev: >>> bypass_master >>> / \ >>> / \ >>> VF_slave backup_slave >>> >>> Is that correct? If not, how does it look like? >>> >>> >> Looks correct. >> VF_slave and backup_slave are the original netdevs and are present in both the models. >> In the 3 netdev model, bypass_master netdev is created and VF_slave an...
2018 Apr 10
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...gt;>>> / >>>>> / >>>>> VF_slave >>>>> >>>>> 3netdev: >>>>> bypass_master >>>>> / \ >>>>> / \ >>>>> VF_slave backup_slave >>>>> >>>>> Is that correct? If not, how does it look like? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Looks correct. >>>> VF_slave and backup_slave are the original netdevs and are present in both the models. >>>> In the 3 netde...
2018 Apr 10
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...#47; >>>>>>> VF_slave >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 3netdev: >>>>>>> bypass_master >>>>>>> / \ >>>>>>> / \ >>>>>>> VF_slave backup_slave >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is that correct? If not, how does it look like? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Looks correct. >>>>>> VF_slave and backup_slave are the original netdevs and are present in...
2018 Apr 11
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 3netdev: >>>>>>>>> bypass_master >>>>>>>>> / \ >>>>>>>>> / \ >>>>>>>>> VF_slave backup_slave >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is that correct? If not, how does it look like? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Looks correct. >>>>>>>> VF_slave and backup_sl...
2018 Apr 11
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...etdev: > >> > > > > > > > > bypass_master > >> > > > > > > > > / \ > >> > > > > > > > > / \ > >> > > > > > > > > VF_slave backup_slave > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Is that correct? If not, how does it look like? > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > &gt...
2018 Apr 06
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 11:08:22PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >This patch enables virtio_net to switch over to a VF datapath when a VF >netdev is present with the same MAC address. It allows live migration >of a VM with a direct attached VF without the need to setup a bond/team >between a VF and virtio net device in the guest. > >The hypervisor needs to enable
2018 Apr 06
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 11:08:22PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >This patch enables virtio_net to switch over to a VF datapath when a VF >netdev is present with the same MAC address. It allows live migration >of a VM with a direct attached VF without the need to setup a bond/team >between a VF and virtio net device in the guest. > >The hypervisor needs to enable