search for: backpropagate

I want to create a neural network, and then everytime it receives new data, instead of creating a new nnet, i want to use a backpropagation algorithm to adjust the weights in the already created nn. I'm using nnet package, I know that nn$wts gives the weights, but I cant find out which weights belong to which conections so I could implement the backpropagation algorithm myself. But if anyone

> (1) Spill cost metrics. I think this one cannot be dissociated from some kind of live range pre-splitting. Cheers, Arnaud From: Lang Hames [mailto:lhames at gmail.com] Sent: 03 June 2016 23:15 To: James Molloy Cc: Arnaud De Grandmaison; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; Sebastian Buchwald; Bernhard Scholz Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] PBQP register allocation and copy propagation Hi James, Arnaud,

Hi, > > I think one idea to improve the situation is to consider the cost vector of adjacent nodes during RN. Let's say you decided to do a RN for node A and want to compute the costs for choosing register %Ri. The current implementation does this by computing min(row/column i of edge A <--> B) but you can do better by adding B's cost vector to the row/column before computing

Hi James, I’ve tried to play in the past with the allocation order, which can definitely be tweaked and improved. The metric we use for spill cost being what it is (i.e. not targeted for PBQP, but that’s a different subject), I found it made real sense to use some other heuristics to sort nodes (on top of the spill cost) when there was a tie between them. Of course, that’s a heuristic and it can

Greetings list, I've just swapped from the "neural" package to the "nnet" package and I've noticed that the training is orders of magnitude faster, and the results are way more accurate. This leads me to wonder, what training algorithm is "nnet" using? Is it a modification on the standard backpropagation? Or a completely different algorithm? I'm

Hi to all, I planned to do project in gsoc... For OCR ( Optimal Character Recoganisation ) ... That is ,,, If we scanning one full text page from book, it will open into open office as word format. so that we can edit the page from scanned text page... I planned to convert scanned letters to words for Tamil, English Languages... I will try to support few more languages

Buenas, He estado leyendo publicaciones sobre las redes neuronales ( y el deep learning) pero no consigo entender el tipo de operaciones que se hacen en cada una de las capas de las redes neuronales. Necesito alguna explicacion más para tontos. ¿Alguien entiende bien lo que hace una red neuronal? Por ejemplo, un randomForest hace el ensamble por boostrap de árbole sde clasificación. Un SVM crea

Does anyone know of any SOM library for R? or any stand alone freeware? A search from google returns SOM_PAK 3.1 developed at Helsinki University of Technology. Is there newer version? Jun -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or

...:attemptTrivialCoalescing almost succeeded; it got as far as testing if the source register R0 is contained in the destination regclass (P). It isn't, so the move stayed in. The problem is that the source register is allocated before coalescing is attempted. The destination regclass does not backpropagate and so doesn't influence the allocation class. PBQP doesn't even attempt to remove a move unless source and destination regclasses are identical. > Right now the x86 target code has to explicitly spell out where > such copies are needed. It isn't a lot of trouble because there...

...t succeeded; it > got > as far as testing if the source register R0 is contained in the > destination regclass (P). It isn't, so the move stayed in. > > The problem is that the source register is allocated before coalescing > is attempted. The destination regclass does not backpropagate and > so doesn't influence the allocation class. The coalescer has the capability to coalesce cross register class copies. It's not quite done. Try -join-cross-class-copies. > > PBQP doesn't even attempt to remove a move unless source and > destination > regclasses...

Hi Lang and Arnaud, I've been testing out the PBQP allocator for Thumb-2 and have ran into a problem I'd love to get your input on. The problem is exemplfied in the codegen for the function @bar in the attached IR file: bar: push {r4, lr} sub sp, #12 (1) movw r2, :lower16:.L_MergedGlobals (1) movt r2, :upper16:.L_MergedGlobals ldm.w r2,

Hi Sebastian, It boils down to this: The previous heuristic solver could return infinite cost solutions in some rare cases (despite finite-cost solutions existing). The new solver is still heuristic, but it should always return a finite cost solution if one exists. It does this by avoiding early reduction of infinite spill cost nodes via R1 or R2. To illustrate why the early reductions can be a

On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 13:28 +1100, Lang Hames wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > It boils down to this: The previous heuristic solver could return > infinite cost solutions in some rare cases (despite finite-cost > solutions existing). The new solver is still heuristic, but it should > always return a finite cost solution if one exists. It does this by > avoiding early reduction of

...ts 10 -> 9 NId 2(%vreg4, GPR64common) moved to conservatively-allocatables. ... Popped NId 2(%vreg4, GPR64common) , all edge costs added: 2.002748e+01 inf inf inf inf inf inf inf inf inf inf ** selection: 0 llc: ../include/llvm/CodeGen/PBQP/ReductionRules.h:214: llvm::PBQP::Solution llvm::PBQP::backpropagate(GraphT&, StackT, llvm::PBQP::NodeSet&) [with GraphT = llvm::PBQP::Gra ph<llvm::PBQP::RegAlloc::RegAllocSolverImpl>; StackT = std::vector<unsigned int>; llvm::PBQP::NodeSet = std::set<unsigned int>]: Assertion `PushedAsConservativelyAllocatabl eNodes.find(NId) == PushedAsCo...

On Mar 15, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: > Hi, > > I am writing a backend for the Blackfin processor from Analog > Devices. I > just started so I still have a lot to learn about the code > generator. So > far, I can compile test/CodeGen/Generic/BasicInstrs.ll correctly, but > that is about it. > > The Blackfin 32-bit registers divide naturally

Hi Lang, > Hmm. Let me make sure I'm reading this right. The constraints are that: > a) All four operands have distinct registers. > b) The first two are in a consecutive pair (second > first) > c) The second two are in a consecutive pair (fourth > third) Constraints b & c are OK, but a is too strict : "mpra %R0, %R1, %R0, %R1" is OK. But I though, may be

Hi Lang, I'm surprised about the fact that you omit R1/R2 reductions in some cases. Can you give a more detailed description of the bug (e.g. a PBQP dump)? Best regards, Sebastian Lang Hames wrote: > Hi Sachin, llvm-dev, > > I've just committed a new PBQP solver which, among other things, > should take care of this bug. > > Please let me know how it works out for you.

...ed to conservatively-allocatables. > > ... > > Popped NId 2(%vreg4, GPR64common) , all edge costs added: > > 2.002748e+01 inf inf inf inf inf inf inf inf inf inf ** selection: 0 > > llc: ../include/llvm/CodeGen/PBQP/ReductionRules.h:214: > llvm::PBQP::Solution llvm::PBQP::backpropagate(GraphT&, StackT, > llvm::PBQP::NodeSet&) [with GraphT = llvm::PBQP::Gra > > ph<llvm::PBQP::RegAlloc::RegAllocSolverImpl>; StackT = > std::vector<unsigned int>; llvm::PBQP::NodeSet = std::set<unsigned int>]: > Assertion `PushedAsConservativelyAllocatabl >...

> A node should never be put into the conservatively allocatable list if there is a chance of it spilling. I can understand why the logic of NodeMetadata::isConservativelyAllocatable is necessary for the node to be allocatable, but I have not been able to convince myself this is sufficient, especially when the node degree > available registers. Cheers, Arnaud From:

Hi Sachin, llvm-dev, I've just committed a new PBQP solver which, among other things, should take care of this bug. Please let me know how it works out for you. Cheers, Lang. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sachin, > > Yes. Bernhard Scholz and I have just discussed a fix for this. I hope to > commit it in the next few days. I