search for: backpointers

Hi All, I''m trying to repair a broken fs using btrfsck and am hitting a failed assertion. I''d appreciate any suggestions for what to do next. Is there any thing I can do to help fix this bug? Any other information from my FS which would help? If the FS could be salvaged that would be a bonus, but I''m more interested in providing a useful bug report before wiping the

Hi all, I''m running btrfs in a 3-disk RAID1 configuration. After a hard power-off, I''m seeing a lot of hung I/O tasks on this volume, apparently due to a corrupt leaf. I first noticed the problem on kernel 3.4.7, and it''s persisted with 3.4.8. Relevant parts of the kernel log follow. [ 85.179621] block group 38684065792 has an wrong amount of free space [

Hi! I used to have arch linux running on 1 btrfs partition (sda1, incl. /boot). When switching to 3.2.5 recently the system fails to boot: (after udevd) /etc/rc.sysinit: line 15: 117 Bus error mountpoint -q /proc and so on, no idea. It used to boot with 3.2.4, but 1) I obviously had some corruption in the tree, when I tried to delete a certain file I hit e.g. "kernel BUG at

Dear All: I am pretty new to xen-devel, please correct me in the following. Assume we have the following terms GPT: guest page table SPT: shadow page table (Question a) When guest OS is running, is it always using SPT for address translation? If it is the case, how does guest OS refer and modify its own GPT content? It seems that there is a page table entry in SPT for the GPT page. (Question

Hello, I have been trying to debug a problem with R-0.90.0 (this bug was in 0.65.1, too). The following code results in seg faults. It doesn't seg-fault on Linux/intel. > memory.profile() > gc() As long as I don't execute memory.profile(), there is no problem with garbage collection. So I think that memory.profile() screws up the heap in some way. When it seg-faults, it dies in

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> --- mkfs.c | 3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/mkfs.c b/mkfs.c index de1beed..0843600 100644 --- a/mkfs.c +++ b/mkfs.c @@ -1196,8 +1196,7 @@ static void process_fs_features(u64 flags) for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mkfs_features); i++) { if (flags & mkfs_features[i].flag) { - fprintf(stderr,

Is it expected that running btrfsck more than once will keep reporting errors? Below is the end of a btrfsck output when run the second time. backpointer mismatch on [111942471680 32768] owner ref check failed [111942471680 32768] ref mismatch on [111942504448 40960] extent item 1, found 0 Incorrect local backref count on 111942504448 root 5 owner 160739 offset 3440640 found 0 wanted 1 back

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Neal N. Wang <neal.wang at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for all the replies which are really helpful. > > one more question regarding transformation: > > 4.  Given an instruction  %x1 = I1,  can I replace the rhs "I1"  with  "I2" > and get a new instruction %x1 = I2?   Alternatively, I can add a new > instruction %x2 =

On 2017?01?27? 16:16, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > We don't really need struct virtio_pci_vq_info, as most field in there > are redundant: > > - the vq backpointer is not strictly neede to start with > - the entry in the vqs list is not needed - the generic virtqueue already > has list, we only need to check if it has a callback to get the same > semantics >

On 2017?01?27? 16:16, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > We don't really need struct virtio_pci_vq_info, as most field in there > are redundant: > > - the vq backpointer is not strictly neede to start with > - the entry in the vqs list is not needed - the generic virtqueue already > has list, we only need to check if it has a callback to get the same > semantics >

On 2017?02?06? 01:15, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > We don't really need struct virtio_pci_vq_info, as most field in there > are redundant: > > - the vq backpointer is not strictly neede to start with > - the entry in the vqs list is not needed - the generic virtqueue already > has list, we only need to check if it has a callback to get the same > semantics >

On 2017?02?06? 01:15, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > We don't really need struct virtio_pci_vq_info, as most field in there > are redundant: > > - the vq backpointer is not strictly neede to start with > - the entry in the vqs list is not needed - the generic virtqueue already > has list, we only need to check if it has a callback to get the same > semantics >

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:44:32PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > We have 3 drivers defining the "underscan", "underscan hborder" and > "underscan vborder" properties (radeon, amd and nouveau) and we are > about to add the same kind of thing in VC4. > > Define generic underscan props and add new fields to the drm_connector > state so that the

Thanks for all the replies which are really helpful. one more question regarding transformation: 4. Given an instruction %x1 = I1, can I replace the rhs "I1" with "I2" and get a new instruction %x1 = I2? Alternatively, I can add a new instruction %x2 = I2, and replace all uses of %x1 with %x2, and then delete %x1 = I1, but it seems the former is simpler or faster if

We have 3 drivers defining the "underscan", "underscan hborder" and "underscan vborder" properties (radeon, amd and nouveau) and we are about to add the same kind of thing in VC4. Define generic underscan props and add new fields to the drm_connector state so that the property parsing logic can be shared by all DRM drivers. A driver can now attach underscan

Hello, This is an attempt at providing generic support for underscan connector props. We already have 3 drivers defining the same underscan, underscan vborder and underscan hborder properties (amd, radeon and nouveau) and I am about to add a new one, hence my proposal to put the prop parsing code in the core and add ->underscan fields to drm_connector_state. Note that I use this new

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 05:15:33PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:44:32PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > We have 3 drivers defining the "underscan", "underscan hborder" and > > "underscan vborder" properties (radeon, amd and nouveau) and we are > > about to add the same kind of thing in VC4. > > > > Define

We don't really need struct virtio_pci_vq_info, as most field in there are redundant: - the vq backpointer is not strictly neede to start with - the entry in the vqs list is not needed - the generic virtqueue already has list, we only need to check if it has a callback to get the same semantics - we can use a simple array to look up the MSI-X vec if needed. - That simple array now

We don't really need struct virtio_pci_vq_info, as most field in there are redundant: - the vq backpointer is not strictly neede to start with - the entry in the vqs list is not needed - the generic virtqueue already has list, we only need to check if it has a callback to get the same semantics - we can use a simple array to look up the MSI-X vec if needed. - That simple array now

On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 03:17:02PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > The check is still there. Meh, I could swear I fixed it up. Here is an updated version: --- >From bf5e3b7fd272aea32388570503f00d0ab592fc2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 13:40:21 +0100 Subject: virtio_pci: remove struct virtio_pci_vq_info We don't really need