search for: backlinks

Hello last week we updated three domain controllers (Sernet Samba) from 4.2 to 4.7, typical upgrade path (4.3->4.4->4.5->4.6->4.7), everything was ok. The next day we got a mail from the Sernet team informing they fixed a bug affecting the group memberships. https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13095 We've applied the update and few days after the update which should

...able corruption can i > expect now? see the bug report for details, this can eg cause loss of group memberships or generally speaking loss of linked-attributes. The only remede is comparing all objects for differences in linked-attributes and restore overwritten forward-links from now dangling backlinks. We're currently also working on an improvement to dbcheck so it can detect such corruption and fix it, but this will only work if you did *not* run dbcheck --fix on the affected database. -slow -- Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https://samba.org/ Samba Developer, SerNet GmbH https://sern...

Hi Samba team and Maxence, > last week we updated three domain controllers (Sernet Samba) from 4.2 to > 4.7, typical upgrade path (4.3->4.4->4.5->4.6->4.7), everything was ok. > > The next day we got a mail from the Sernet team informing they fixed a > bug affecting the group memberships. > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13095 > > We've

I tried to join a samba4 to a win2008r2 level domain (OS level 2012) running exchange 2010. The join succeeds but the later replication is broken due to schema differences. In order to to find the cause, I started a test setup with: * a win2008r2 DC w/ minimal AD * upgraded the schema and the OS to 2012 (function level is still 2008r2) * and added a exchange server to the domain. And that is

Good Morning (or not), I am running three Samba AD DCs all at version 4.7.2 on Ubuntu 16.04.  All three have run flawlessly for over a year. Last night one of the DCs started failing Replication with both the other DCs so I decided to run samba-tool dbcheck . Resulting in several: ERROR: orphaned backlink attribute 'memberOf' in CN=Annamarie Foyles,CN=Users,DC=cy,DC=cybernetics,DC=com

> The advantage of storing this in the granulepos field itself, like > theora and CMML do, is that the seek code may already understand how > to handle the back pointer. Right now everything assumes the mapping > is from 'initialized decoder' + 'granulepos from page header' => > timestamp, or in the case of theora and CMML => 'timestamp' + 'last

On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 10:16 -0500, Bob Thomas via samba wrote: > Good Morning (or not), > > I am running three Samba AD DCs all at version 4.7.2 on Ubuntu 16.04.  > All three have run flawlessly for over a year. > Last night one of the DCs started failing Replication with both the > other DCs so I decided to run samba-tool dbcheck . > Resulting in several: > > ERROR:

...;body> <div style="text-align: center;"><span dir="rtl"> Do you want to boost your blog in Google?! You can give your blog a huge kick by backlinking with other websites. I know this isn''t new news, but so many people forget to build strong and relevant backlinks to their websites. We all know how important backlinks are at ranking our websites. The results for being ranked #1 in Google for your keyword are fantastic. If you are yet to experience the rush of thousands of visitors buying and clicking on your website every day then you really are missing out...

Hello everyone, I'm having a problem with the replication of the Active Directory from a Windows Server 2003 r2 DC to a Samba 4.1.6 (Ubuntu 14.04) DC. The problem we have is that the *memberOf* attribute is missing on two users in the Samba ldap database after adding them to a group on the Windows DC. I can't easily add these through a Ldap administration tool and can't add them to

On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 13:07 +0000, Andrej Gessel via samba wrote: > Hello list, > > maybe I saw the same error with backlinks. I try to use Samba 4.7.0 as rodc and perform join with "domain-critical-only"-option. Smb.conf is generated by samba. After starting joined samba I got error like this: Does it change if you don't use that option? > Failed to apply records: ../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl...

After some more thought on this, I'm trying to work out whether the back link offset needs precision. Semantically, the only need we have for this is to be able to seek back to a point before the start of the earliest event still active at the time of the original seek. As far as I know, and please correct me if I'm wrong, nothing in Ogg mandates that this backlink actually resolves to a

Hello list, somebody can helpe, my problem is when I run this command ./samba-tool dbcheck Checking 6205 objects ERROR: missing backlink attribute 'memberOf' in CN=Sandy,OU=Administrador de Red,OU=Comercializadora,OU=CUPET,DC=eccmg,DC=cupet,DC=cu for link member in CN=SHARE\0ADEL:ddacaf41-c14f-4e7c-8606-704eec753a4f,CN=Deleted Objects,DC=eccmg,DC=cupet,DC=cu Not fixing missing backlink

...ades from early 4.0 > beta to 4.7, I was not sure if I was stumbling on some rotten entries in > my ldb database, or if it was a more widespread bug :-) Metze has some patches that should better fix the backlink issue in dbcheck, and I've proposed some patches to ensure that additional backlinks don't cause trouble if the object needs to be deleted. If dbcheck gives any more information when it fails to fix the missing or orphaned backlink, it would be helpful to see that so we can ensure we cover all the test cases needed for this. Thanks, Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett...

On 11-Feb-08, at 2:46 AM, ogg.k.ogg.k@googlemail.com wrote: > For reference, my data packets start with start granule, end > granule, backlink > granule, all 64 bits, so picking the granule is just a simple > constant offset > lookup into the data packet, eg, you replace: > > backlink = granulepos<<32; > > by > > backlink =

...ike unicodePwd or supplimentalCredentials to a public mailing list. Running 'samba-tool drs clone-dc-database' against one of the DCs would be very instructive. This does the same thing as a fresh join, but without adding any DC objects. The dbcheck errors you mention are interesting. Backlinks are only implicitly transferred over DRS replication, but if they are very wrong perhaps the update of them failed. What did the powershell script do? Did it just delete users, or did it try to remove them from the group first? If replication broke only after user/group modification, then this m...

Hello Han, I am pleased you approve of the design and implementation of the XI shadow mechanism. And I appreciate the time and care you''ve taken in reviewing this substantial body of new code. You asked about performance statistics. With the current XI patch, we are seeing the following: - page faults times for XI are about 4 times faster than non-XI: 10.56 (non-XI) vs 2.43

My samba4.11 server will only replicate one way: windows -> samba. Replication from samba -> windows fails. Details follow. I have a Samba 4.11 domain controller (fs1) that was added to an existing domain that had a Windows Server 2003R2 domain controller (fs) and Windows Small Business Server 2011 (sbs). fs1 is running on Debian 7.6 My issues seems similar to

Hi all, I have an old dc (4.0.9). Let's call it dc1. I also have a new one (4.5.16) which I'm planning to switch to. Let's call it dc2. After initial set up of dc2 I initialised replication and things looked ok for a couple of weeks. Recently I've managed to mess it up. Possibly by editing users and DNS records. Or copying Kerberos cache and trying to use it elsewhere for

Hello list, maybe I saw the same error with backlinks. I try to use Samba 4.7.0 as rodc and perform join with "domain-critical-only"-option. Smb.conf is generated by samba. After starting joined samba I got error like this: Failed to apply records: ../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c:4218: Failed to remove backlink of memberO...

> No particular answers, but I can at least point out that the way > things were designed for CMML was to work with the existing Ogg > seeking algorithm. The idea is that a generic seeking routine can work > on any Ogg file, as long as it knows the granulepos->time mapping for > the logical bitstreams in the file. That's why all the > timestamp-related info is crammed into