search for: backgroundrb_result

...usr/local/bin/ruby18 /usr/local/bin/mon cwarner 80804 0.0 1.3 46872 39688 ?? S 10:37PM 0:02.43 ruby: backgroundrb (ruby) cwarner 80805 0.0 0.7 21512 20548 ?? S 10:37PM 0:00.07 ruby: backgroundrb_logger (ruby) cwarner 80806 0.0 0.7 21468 20556 ?? S 10:37PM 0:00.06 ruby: backgroundrb_results (ruby) My four Mongrels in the cluster sitting out there, and the three backgroundrb processes. I then proceed to generate a worker using MiddleMan via IRB, get the auto generated job key, look up the worker, and then delete him. All goes well, and the process list still looks like what I posted...

....1.101:2000 20070621-14:59:39 (10124) timer_sleep: 60 20070621-14:59:39 (10124) Installed DRb ACL 20070621-14:59:41 (10127) Starting worker: BackgrounDRb::Worker::WorkerLogger backgroundrb_logger (backgroundrb_logger) () 20070621-14:59:41 (10127) Starting worker: BackgrounDRb::Worker::WorkerResults backgroundrb_results (backgroundrb_results) () 20070621-14:59:41 (10127) Loading Worker Class File: /var/www/near- time.net/releases/20070621035836/lib/workers/grab_feed_worker.rb 20070621-14:59:41 (10127) Loading Worker Class File: /var/www/near- time.net/releases/20070621035836/lib/workers/unzip_worker.rb 3809,1...

.../home/ed/Documents/test/config/backgroundrb.yml 20061120-17:04:52 (31960) rails_env: development 20061120-17:04:52 (31960) Starting worker: BackgrounDRb::Worker::WorkerLogger backgroundrb_logger (backgroundrb_logger) () 20061120-17:04:52 (31960) Starting worker: BackgrounDRb::Worker::WorkerResults backgroundrb_results (backgroundrb_results) () 20061120-17:04:52 (31960) Loading Worker Class File: /home/ed/Documents/test/lib/workers/document_sorter_worker.rb 20061120-17:04:52 (31960) Loading Sechedule: argsclassdocument_sorter_worker trigger_typetriggerworker_methoddo_workworker_method_argsclassdocument_sorter_wo...

...026) timer_sleep: 60 20070312-18:14:31 (24026) port: 22222 20070312-18:14:31 (24026) pool_size: 5 20070312-18:14:31 (24028) Starting worker: BackgrounDRb::Worker::WorkerLogger backgroundrb_logger (backgroundrb_logger) () 20070312-18:14:31 (24028) Starting worker: BackgrounDRb::Worker::WorkerResults backgroundrb_results (backgroundrb_results) () 20070312-18:14:31 (24028) Loading Worker Class File: /home/david/redclay/lib/workers/variant_addition_worker.rb 20070312-18:14:31 (24028) Loading Worker Class File: /home/david/redclay/lib/workers/variant_remove_worker.rb 20070312-18:14:31 (24028) Loading Worker Class Fil...

...ing "eval "ObjectSpace.each_object(Slave){|x| p x if !x.status}"" I''ve got a strange result though: #<Slave:0x34c0fb0 @shutdown=false, @obj=#<BackgrounDRb::Worker::WorkerResults:0x34c0fc4 @worker_results={}, @initial_do_work=true, @results={}, @args=nil, @jobkey=:backgroundrb_results>, @lifeline=#<Slave::LifeLine:0x34c0858 @pair=[#<Socket:0x34c07e0>, nil], @fds=[9, 10], @pid=27245, @socket=#<Socket:0x34c07e0>, @object_id=27657260, @owner=27245>, @socket_creation_attempts=42, @dumped=nil, @pid=27248, @status=nil, @debug=false, @object=#<DRb::DRbObject:0x...

.../var/www/the-soup/current $ ps -efl 1 S deploy 23184 1 0 75 0 - 27056 stext 11:27 ? 00:00:04 backgroundrb 1 S deploy 23186 23184 0 76 0 - 14444 - 11:27 ? 00:00:00 backgroundrb_logger 1 S deploy 23187 23184 0 76 0 - 14768 - 11:27 ? 00:00:00 backgroundrb_results 0 R jodi 23799 23755 0 76 0 - 676 - 14:06 pts/0 00:00:00 grep backgroundrb Does this make sense? Since I''m starting backgroundrb with capistrano, the only thing I can think of is that it''s the pid of the starting process? Short of the above, my current w...

...on Backgroundrb workers older than 30 minutes: class WorkerCleaner def self.remove_stale_workers MiddleMan.gc!(Time.now - 60*30) end end I stuck is under /lib in my Rails app and run it using script/runner from a cron job. The only problem I''m seeing is that this script kills my backgroundrb_results and backgroundrb_logger jobs after they''ve been running for more than 30 minutes. Is this expected? How can I alter this script to ignore the results and logger jobs and let them continue to run while cleaning up anything else that has expired? Thanks, Matthew -------------- next part --...

.../local/bin/ruby /usr/local/bin/mongrel_rai root 678 0.0 0.2 39076 1816 ?? S 10:47AM 2:22.97 ruby: backgroundrb (ruby) root 679 0.0 0.0 20824 0 ?? IW - 0:00.00 ruby: backgroundrb_logger (ruby) root 681 0.0 0.0 20824 0 ?? IW - 0:00.00 ruby: backgroundrb_results (ruby) root 688 0.0 0.0 67288 0 ?? IW - 0:00.00 ruby: alerts_worker_alerts_key (ruby) root 2266 0.0 0.0 348 224 p0 R+ 4:42PM 0:00.00 grep ruby I have thought of having a sleep call inside my do_work, but I dont like that...i want to keep my design as simple...

...oundrb server, and it and the other processes seem to be running fine: todd 6865 0.0 0.6 16484 13372 ? S 21:20 0:00 backgroundrb todd 6866 0.0 0.6 16320 13168 ? S 21:20 0:00 backgroundrb_logger todd 6867 0.0 0.6 16520 13384 ? S 21:20 0:00 backgroundrb_results My config file looks like this: :host: localhost :port: 22222 :worker_dir: lib/workers :rails_env: development :pool_size: 15 :acl: :deny: all :allow: localhost 127.0.0.1 :order: deny allow When I try to run the example, I get a NameError because it can''t seem to find my...

...mp/backgroundrb.5594 20070313-15:45:17 (5594) pool_size: 5 20070313-15:45:17 (5594) host: localhost 20070313-15:45:17 (5594) Starting worker: BackgrounDRb::Worker::WorkerLogger backgroundrb_logger (backgroundrb_logger) () 20070313-15:45:17 (5594) Starting worker: BackgrounDRb::Worker::WorkerResults backgroundrb_results (backgroundrb_results) () 20070313-15:45:17 (5594) Loading Worker Class File: /Users/jnutting/work/m_project/lib/workers/mb_receiver.rb 20070313-15:45:17 (5594) Loading Worker Class File: /Users/jnutting/work/m_project/lib/workers/mb_sender.rb 20070313-15:45:17 (5594) Loading Worker Class File: /U...

...#39;ve been able to do the same. My initial test worker runs fine as a non-RailsBase worker. Once I switch it to load rails as part of the worker, I run into a problem with fork, namely: Resource temporarily unavailable - fork(2) - (Errno::EAGAIN). My debug log statements within Middleman show that backgroundrb_results and backgroundrb_logger get loaded fine, but any rails worker dies in the new_worker method of middleman, when attempting to create the slave_obj. Any ideas? I''ve done a significant amount of poking around the cygwin lists but haven''t found anything of import to relate. I'...

Hi, I''m using backgroundrb 0.2.1 in a production environment and for most parts I''m very happy. We are using it to do some heavy video editing on the server side and it works great except that under, what seems heavy load the below problem happens intermittently. The problem has only happened 5 times out of over 500 runs by our backgroundrb worker. This is the code in our