Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "bacially".
Did you mean:
bascially
2006 Nov 23
1
Asterisk with SER
HI,
I'm not able to find some good doc or manual regarding Integration of
Asterisk with SER. Bacially, I want to forward my calls from SER to
asterisk. If some one already done this please guide me.
thanks in advance
arun
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061123/78957271/attachment.htm
2011 Apr 11
1
[CTDB] how does LMASTER know where the record is stored?
...gs change over
years, but I just have two questions about LMASTER:
< this is from pdf >
LMASTER fixed
? LMASTER is based on record key only
? LMASTER knows where the record is stored
? new records are stored on LMASTER
Q1. From the output of "ctdb status" I can see that LMASTER is bacially
configured as the node itself, then how does each node know where the record
is stored? By broadcast to all nodes or any other way? And more importantly,
when?
Q2. If new records are stored on LMASTER, do these records need to be synced
within the cluster? And when?
Excuse me if this comes off so...
2010 Oct 09
0
home share and user map issue
.../homes -U bar%<passwd>
Guess what? 1) and 2) work well, I can get into home directory and mkdir and
everything. Against 3) however, I could still log in, but when I try 'ls' I
get these:
do_list: [\*] NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND
Error in dskattr: NT_STATUS_OBJECT_PATH_NOT_FOUND
Bacially I can't do nothing via 3), only 'pwd' shows "Current directory is
\\localhost\homes\", seems Samba succeeded to authenticate user but failed
to resolve into the correct home directory.
So what's big deal you might say, 1) and 2) still work fine. True, but this
bothers me...