search for: babraham

.....got everything working. Does this need reporting upstream as a bug in R or lapack? I'm good now, but it might help others to get this fixed. Simon. -----Original Message----- From: Ivan Krylov <ikrylov at disroot.org> Sent: 08 May 2024 20:05 To: Simon Andrews <simon.andrews at babraham.ac.uk> Cc: Simon Andrews via R-help <r-help at r-project.org>; Miguel Esteva <esteva.m at wehi.edu.au> Subject: Re: [R] Compilation problems with R4.4.0 ? Wed, 8 May 2024 16:59:25 +0000 Simon Andrews <simon.andrews at babraham.ac.uk> ?????: > The lapack libraries are: >...

? Wed, 8 May 2024 16:59:25 +0000 Simon Andrews <simon.andrews at babraham.ac.uk> ?????: > The lapack libraries are: > > $ rpm -qa | grep lapack > lapack-3.9.0-10.el9.x86_64 > lapack64_-3.9.0-10.el9.x86_64 > lapack64-3.9.0-10.el9.x86_64 > lapack-devel-3.9.0-10.el9.x86_64 Thanks for this information! I figured out I needed to enable the "Pow...

...ve developers. Is this true? Do new style classes have an active future? Is R committed to them? Insightful? I use old-style (S version3 engine) and new-style (S version4) classes in the sense of Venables and Ripley. ------------------------------------- Dr Jonathan Swinton Proteom Ltd Babraham Hall Babraham Cambridge CB2 4AT www.proteom.com -----------------------------------

...ve developers. Is this true? Do new style classes have an active future? Is R committed to them? Insightful? I use old-style (S version3 engine) and new-style (S version4) classes in the sense of Venables and Ripley. ------------------------------------- Dr Jonathan Swinton Proteom Ltd Babraham Hall Babraham Cambridge CB2 4AT www.proteom.com -----------------------------------