Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "b_test".
Did you mean:
_test
2020 Sep 03
3
LLD: Can we make --warn-backrefs the default?
...that use subsets of the libraries. For example, linking a program
>that depends only on B would result in detecting the invalid B -> C
>dependency.
This is actually cumbersome and is explicitly described in https://reviews.llvm.org/D86762
If B -> C is not specified,
* If people write B_test ("linking a program that depends only on B"),
they will notice the dependency issue immediately via the "undefined symbol" diagnostic.
* If such a B_test does not exist. The user may work on a large
application which depends on B (and transitively on D) but not on A.
OK...
2020 Sep 03
2
LLD: Can we make --warn-backrefs the default?
...arn-backrefs, as this will not catch every possible layering problem
>before shipping the library, as they will not have a copy of every
>customer's program. Instead, they will be better served by a separate tool.
>
>If B -> C is not specified,
>>
>> * If people write B_test ("linking a program that depends only on B"),
>> they will notice the dependency issue immediately via the "undefined
>> symbol" diagnostic.
>> * If such a B_test does not exist. The user may work on a large
>> application which depends on B (and tr...
2020 Sep 04
2
LLD: Can we make --warn-backrefs the default?
...oblem
>> >before shipping the library, as they will not have a copy of every
>> >customer's program. Instead, they will be better served by a separate
>> tool.
>> >
>> >If B -> C is not specified,
>> >>
>> >> * If people write B_test ("linking a program that depends only on B"),
>> >> they will notice the dependency issue immediately via the "undefined
>> >> symbol" diagnostic.
>> >> * If such a B_test does not exist. The user may work on a large
>> >> ap...
2020 Sep 21
2
LLD: Can we make --warn-backrefs the default?
...as they will not have a copy of every
>>>> >customer's program. Instead, they will be better served by a separate
>>>> tool.
>>>> >
>>>> >If B -> C is not specified,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> * If people write B_test ("linking a program that depends only on
>>>> B"),
>>>> >> they will notice the dependency issue immediately via the
>>>> "undefined
>>>> >> symbol" diagnostic.
>>>> >> * If such a B_test does not e...
2020 Sep 02
2
LLD: Can we make --warn-backrefs the default?
On 2020-09-01, Petr Hosek wrote:
>I see the GNU ld behavior as a limitation, not as a feature, as Peter Smith
>also pointed out in https://reviews.llvm.org/D86762. While it can be argued
>that there are certain cases where it can help detect layering
>violations as you mentioned in your change, I'm not sure how valuable that
>is in practice. Every case I've encountered so