search for: b_state

...r/run/random-seed': No such file or directory Then, it goes a little farther, and I get an Assertion. I turned on the buffer header debugging, and here's the output: buffer trace for buffer at 0xc02db000 (I am CPU 0) journal_dirty_metadata() [transaction.c:1101] file as BJ_Metadata b_state:0xb1 b_list:BUF_CLEAN b_jlist:BJ_Metadata on_lru:1 cpu:0 on_hash:1 b_count:2 b_blocknr:1 b_jbd:1 b_frozen_data:00000000 b_committed_data:00000000 b_transaction:1 b_next_transaction:0 b_cp_transaction:0 b_trans_is_running:1 b_trans_is_comitting:0 b_jcount:0 <0> journal_dir...

Hi Stephen, I'm one of developers of SnapFS, which based on Ext3. I got Assertion failure from SnapFS, at ext3_new_block() in fs/ext3/balloc.c: J_ASSERT (!test_and_set_bit(BH_Alloced, &bh->b_state)) If J_ASSERT is only use as debug, why it will modify data? I found the 'BH_Alloced' flag only occures at two place: one is balloc.c as above, the other is at journal_forget() in fs/jfs/transaction.c: J_ASSERT (!test_and_set_bit(BH_Freed, &bh->b_state)); clear_bit(BH_Alloced, &am...

Hi, By running some scripts on our target system for a while, I lost all means of access to the system. It seems that the kernel is crashed with the following error message: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:731: "(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Uptodate)) != 0)" Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4 We are currently running Linux version 2.4.18. I assume that the problem has been fixed. Can anyone tell me which version of linux kernel has the fix or where can I get the fix? Thanks a lot in advance. Regards,...

We have DELL 2650 with CENTOS 3.4 installed. Today I saw following messages on /var/log/messages. Anyone know what it mean? Does it point to which disk? =================================== Jun 4 06:58:40 ORA03 kernel: EXT3-fs unexpected failure: (((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Uptodate)) != 0); Jun 4 06:58:40 ORA03 kernel: Possible IO failure. Jun 4 06:58:40 ORA03 kernel: Jun 4 06:58:45 ORA03 kernel: EXT3-fs unexpected failure: (((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Uptodate)) != 0); Jun 4 06:58:45 ORA03 kernel: Possible IO failure. J...

...buffer_state(bh, Freed)) { JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "add to new checkpointing trans"); __journal_insert_checkpoint(jh, commit_transaction); JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "refile for checkpoint writeback"); __journal_refile_buffer(jh); } else { + clear_bit(BH_Freed, &bh->b_state); J_ASSERT_BH(bh, !buffer_dirty(bh)); J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_next_transaction == NULL); __journal_unfile_buffer(jh); --- ./fs/jbd/transaction.c 2002/05/26 23:13:05 1.2 +++ ./fs/jbd/transaction.c 2002/05/28 09:24:45 @@ -1834,6 +1834,7 @@ * running transaction if that is set, but no...

Hi all (and developers in particular) I just got bitten by this Assertion. The one that starts as in the subject, and ends with: "!(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)" Google reminds me that it was mentioned a few times earlier this year, but I couldn't find any statement saying that it has been fixed. I got this in a 2.4.16 kernel, though the reports I found were 2.4.18. So my question is: has this been fixed yet...

In 2.4.20-pre5 an optimisation was made to the ext3 fsync function which can very easily cause file data corruption at unmount time. This was first reported by Nick Piggin on November 29th (one day after 2.4.20 was released, and three months after the bug was merged. Unfortunate timing) This only affects filesystems which were mounted with the `data=journal' option. Or files which are

...and on my laptop (about three csets shy of the v2.6.0-test6 tag). Both bombed out in the journal. My uml provider forwarded this from the uml console: Assertion failure in journal_revoke() at revoke.c:329: "!(__builtin_constant_p(BH_Revoked) ? constant_test_bit((BH_Revoked),(&bh->b_state)) : variable_test_bit((BH_Revoked),(&bh->b_state)))" Kernel panic: kernel BUG at revoke.c:329! I was able to use dmesg(1) to see the prink() the laptop generated but was unable to copy it down. It did reference journal... and var was remounted ro, so I presume it is a similar issue....

...pen files. Any ideas? I have no idea what triggered it; this is a big file/web/mail server, with all of that on the ext3 volume. And I've never run ksymoops before, but I think I did it right. - Josh Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:609: "!(((jh2bh(jh)) ->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)" invalid operand: 0000 CPU: 1 EIP: 0010:[<e094e941>] Not tainted EFLAGS: 00010286 eax: 00000078 ebx: d89c0d90 ecx: 00000046 edx: 00000001 esi: d9a36c60 edi: d89c0d90 ebp: de2dbc94 esp: d7d0dd98 ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018 Proces...

...ontains log descriptors */ +#define BJ_Reserved 7 /* Buffer is reserved for access by journal */ +#define BJ_Types 8 /* * Try to keep the most commonly used fields in single cache lines (16 These two hunks obviously conflict. A quick inspection reveals that the BH* constants are used in the b_state member of the struct buffer_head which is defined to be an unsigned long. It seems to be that simply leaving BH_LowPrio wth 8 and starting the ext3 BH constants at 9 (with BH_Temp) should be safe. Comments? b.

I had the following spat out by syslog on my (2.4.18-pre7-ac3) mailer / web server: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:611: "!(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)" One of its partitions froze hard--I've rebooted it, and I have an oops which the BUG() triggered which won't decode at the moment, but I'll sort that one out overnight. (It didn't make it to the filesystem, but I captured it from home.) I&...

...lease inform me if must upgrade to a more recent kernel ? Thanks a lot the kernel logs are : in errors logs Oct 18 17:31:16 tadorne kernel: Assertion failure in journal_revoke_Rb5884a32() at revoke.c:307: "!(__builtin_constant_p(BH_Revoked) ? constant_test_bit((BH_Revoked),(&bh->b_state)) : variable_test_bit((BH_Revoked),(&bh->b_state)))" Oct 18 17:41:30 tadorne kernel: task `ip' exit_signal 17 in reparent_to_init in warnings logs Oct 18 17:31:16 tadorne kernel: kernel BUG at revoke.c:307! Oct 18 17:31:16 tadorne kernel: invalid operand: 0000 Oct 18 17:31:16 ta...

Hi, My current code is tripping the following assertion: lib/libzpool/build-kernel/arc.c:736: arc_change_state: Assertion `new_state->size + to_delta >= new_state->lsize (0x2a60000 >= 0x2a64000)` failed. gdb info: Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted. #0 0x00002afcd767847b in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x00002afcd767847b in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1

...kernel 2.4.18-ac3 and more recently under 2.4.19-rc1: EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,3)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 I've now been able to capture the following Oops before the system went down entirely: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:611: "!(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)" kernel BUG at transaction.c:611! invalid operand: 0000 CPU: 0 EIP: 0010:[<c015b12e>] Not tainted EFLAGS: 00010282 eax: 00000078 ebx: ddadd294 ecx: 00000004 edx: ddb0ff64 esi: ddadd200 edi: dec5d920 ebp: ddadd200 esp: d28dfe70 ds:...

I have ext3 0.0.6b + 2.2.19 and cannot get ext3 to compile as a module. If I try to modularize it, or turn in off completely, the kernel build fails. Is there an easy fix for this, or is there something that I am missing? Thanks. Peter

...e I am not sure how serious the problem is. The assert text is as follows: -- cut here -- cut here -- cut here -- cut here -- cut here -- Message from syslogd@dax at Tue Oct 9 12:07:47 2001 ... dax kernel: Assertion failure in jbd_preclean_buffer_check() at jbd-kernel.c:80: "(((bh)->b_state & (1UL << BH_Dirty)) != 0)" -- cut here -- cut here -- cut here -- cut here -- cut here -- Here is line 80 from jbd-kernel.c: -- cut here -- cut here -- cut here -- cut here -- cut here -- J_ASSERT_JH(jh, buffer_dirty(bh)); -- cut here -- cut here -- cut he...

...ualLength) >> osb->sect_size_bits); block++) { LOG_TRACE_ARGS("setting block %lu as new!\n", block); - alloc_bh = getblk(OCFS_GET_BLOCKDEV(sb), block, sb->s_blocksize); + alloc_bh = sb_getblk(sb, block); +#warning unchecked allocation here alloc_bh->b_state |= (1UL << BH_New); brelse(alloc_bh); } Index: src/volcfg.c =================================================================== --- src/volcfg.c (revision 1014) +++ src/volcfg.c (working copy) @@ -496,7 +491,7 @@ } blocknum = lock_off >> sb->s_blocksize_bits; - bh = ge...

...cknr 3616336) Mar 2 14:18:38 test5 kernel: Unexpected dirty buffer encountered at do_get_write_access:618 (03:05 blocknr 3692808) I've duplicated it in 2.4.22 and 2.4.25. Here's the crash from 2.4.25: Assertion failure in journal_commit_transaction() at commit.c:759: "!(((bh)->b_state & (1UL << BH_Dirty)) != 0)" kernel BUG at commit.c:759! invalid operand: 0000 CPU: 0 EIP: 0010:[<c0174064>] Not tainted Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386 EFLAGS: 00010282 eax: 00000074 ebx: f7221f00 ecx: f7752000 edx: f7795f7c esi: f71a9c00 edi...

...I am running Redhat 7.2 with kernel 2.4.7-10 on a Dual CPU, 2 GB RAM machine. I am running Sendmail , Cyrus IMAP and Ldap on the machine After few hours I get the following error in the syslog error file Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:606: "!(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)" May 26 17:29:37 netserv kernel: kernel BUG at transaction.c:606! May 26 17:29:37 netserv kernel: invalid operand: 0000 May 26 17:29:37 netserv kernel: CPU: 1 May 26 17:29:37 netserv kernel: EIP: 0010:[eepro100:__insmod_eepro100_O/lib/modules/2.4.7-10s mp...

...hat? Right now this system is running Redhat 7.2. When I can get a maintenance window I'm going to upgrade to 7.3 and I'm hoping there is a standard kernel available that fixes these problems. kernel: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:612: "!(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)" As many other people have mentioned, I get this while doing a du(1) on a certain ext3 partition. This particular device that I'm having problems with is an LVM volume. The server is an SMB/AFP/NFS file server, and was serving files during the du. TI...