search for: b_cont

...ot;associative" array. If all that an array takes as an index is an int64_t, is there any reason for dtrace to require me to have an explicit type conversion in there rather than having it do it for me automatically? At present I need to do: mblks[arg0] or mblks[(int64_t)((mblk_t *)arg0)->b_cont] whereas what I''d like to be able to do is: mblks[arg0] and mblks[((mblks_t *)arg0)->b_cont] and have dtrace worry about what b_cont needs to be transformed into in order for that to work. Darren

Hi i''m trying to write my first dtrace script apparently i bit off a bit more than i can chew, i want to track io over sockets, i found your socketsize.d that gave me how to track writes, but i''m at a loss how to track reads, frankly i don''t see how your write tracker works because it uses a probe in a function that only takes two arguments but you grab size of write

Hi, all I want to get some information of How xVM is integrated with Crossbow project. Do some buddies have those documents or blogs? Thanks --luke