Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "b92392b717".
2019 Jun 29
4
[libnbd] How close are we to declaring a stable API?
As the subject says, how close are we to being able to declare a
stable API for libnbd?
I believe these are the main topics:
* Do we need to have an extra thread for writing? I'm unclear about
whether b92392b717 (which allows the state machine to break during
reply processing) means we definitely don't need threads. I imagine
that two threads doing simultaneous send(2) and recv(2) calls could
still improve performance (eg. having two cores copying skbs from
userspace to and from kernel).
* Sh...
2019 Jul 03
0
Re: [libnbd] How close are we to declaring a stable API?
On 6/29/19 5:25 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> As the subject says, how close are we to being able to declare a
> stable API for libnbd?
>
> I believe these are the main topics:
>
> * Do we need to have an extra thread for writing? I'm unclear about
> whether b92392b717 (which allows the state machine to break during
> reply processing) means we definitely don't need threads. I imagine
> that two threads doing simultaneous send(2) and recv(2) calls could
> still improve performance (eg. having two cores copying skbs from
> userspace to and...