Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "b86294fc".
2019 May 07
2
[PATCH 1/5] drm: don't set the pci power state if the pci subsystem handles the ACPI bits
...ptimus_dsm(nouveau_dsm_priv.dhandle,
> NOUVEAU_DSM_OPTIMUS_CAPS,
> NOUVEAU_DSM_OPTIMUS_SET_POWERDOWN, &result);
> -
> + return true;
> }
>
> void nouveau_unregister_dsm_handler(void)
> diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h
> index b86294fc..09b2a82d 100644
> --- a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h
> +++ b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ bool nouveau_is_optimus(void);
> bool nouveau_is_v1_dsm(void);
> void nouveau_register_dsm_handler(void);
> void nouveau_unregister_dsm_handler(void);
> -void nouveau_swi...
2019 May 04
0
[PATCH 1/5] drm: don't set the pci power state if the pci subsystem handles the ACPI bits
...au_switcheroo_optimus_dsm(void)
nouveau_optimus_dsm(nouveau_dsm_priv.dhandle, NOUVEAU_DSM_OPTIMUS_CAPS,
NOUVEAU_DSM_OPTIMUS_SET_POWERDOWN, &result);
-
+ return true;
}
void nouveau_unregister_dsm_handler(void)
diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h
index b86294fc..09b2a82d 100644
--- a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h
+++ b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ bool nouveau_is_optimus(void);
bool nouveau_is_v1_dsm(void);
void nouveau_register_dsm_handler(void);
void nouveau_unregister_dsm_handler(void);
-void nouveau_switcheroo_optimus_dsm(void);
+bool no...
2019 May 07
0
[PATCH v2 1/4] drm: don't set the pci power state if the pci subsystem handles the ACPI bits
...6 @@ void nouveau_switcheroo_optimus_dsm(void)
nouveau_optimus_dsm(nouveau_dsm_priv.dhandle, NOUVEAU_DSM_OPTIMUS_CAPS,
NOUVEAU_DSM_OPTIMUS_SET_POWERDOWN, &result);
-
}
void nouveau_unregister_dsm_handler(void)
diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h
index b86294fc..0f5d7aa0 100644
--- a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h
+++ b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ void nouveau_switcheroo_optimus_dsm(void);
int nouveau_acpi_get_bios_chunk(uint8_t *bios, int offset, int len);
bool nouveau_acpi_rom_supported(struct device *);
void *nouveau_acpi_edid(struct dr...
2019 Jun 14
0
[PATCH] drm: don't set the pci power state if the pci subsystem handles the ACPI bits
...6 @@ void nouveau_switcheroo_optimus_dsm(void)
nouveau_optimus_dsm(nouveau_dsm_priv.dhandle, NOUVEAU_DSM_OPTIMUS_CAPS,
NOUVEAU_DSM_OPTIMUS_SET_POWERDOWN, &result);
-
}
void nouveau_unregister_dsm_handler(void)
diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h
index b86294fc..0f5d7aa0 100644
--- a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h
+++ b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ void nouveau_switcheroo_optimus_dsm(void);
int nouveau_acpi_get_bios_chunk(uint8_t *bios, int offset, int len);
bool nouveau_acpi_rom_supported(struct device *);
void *nouveau_acpi_edid(struct dr...
2019 May 07
0
[PATCH 1/5] drm: don't set the pci power state if the pci subsystem handles the ACPI bits
..._OPTIMUS_CAPS,
> > NOUVEAU_DSM_OPTIMUS_SET_POWERDOWN, &result);
> > -
> > + return true;
> > }
> >
> > void nouveau_unregister_dsm_handler(void)
> > diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h
> > index b86294fc..09b2a82d 100644
> > --- a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h
> > +++ b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.h
> > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ bool nouveau_is_optimus(void);
> > bool nouveau_is_v1_dsm(void);
> > void nouveau_register_dsm_handler(void);
> > void nouveau_unregister_dsm_handler...
2019 May 04
10
[PATCH 0/5] Potential fix for runpm issues on various laptops
While investigating the runpm issues on my GP107 I noticed that something
inside devinit makes runpm break. If Nouveau loads up to the point right
before doing devinit, runpm works without any issues, if devinit is ran,
not anymore.
Out of curiousity I even tried to "bisect" devinit by not running it on
vbios provided signed PMU image, but on the devinit parser we have inside
Nouveau.
2019 May 07
8
[PATCH v2 0/4] Potential fix for runpm issues on various laptops
CCing linux-pci and Bjorn Helgaas. Maybe we could get better insights on
how a reasonable fix would look like.
Anyway, to me this entire issue looks like something which has to be fixed
on a PCI level instead of inside a driver, so it makes sense to ask the
pci folks if they have any better suggestions.
Original cover letter:
While investigating the runpm issues on my GP107 I noticed that