Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "b7uk7djm4fx7j_ehsuohedd".
2016 Jul 22
2
ThinLTO status in trunk?
> On Jul 22, 2016, at 12:36 PM, Teresa Johnson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Vikram,
>
> Thanks!
>
> I'm not sure what part got committed in the 3.8 timeframe - it looks like that was released back in March?
3.8 was branched in early January though.
It has some of the work-in-progress for ThinLTO, it “could” work in simple cases I
2016 Oct 17
3
BoF: Shipping Software as LLVM IR (@Upcoming Dev Mtg)
...he system.
Somehow related, I posted this recently to llvm-dev: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-September/105273.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.llvm.org_pipermail_llvm-2Ddev_2016-2DSeptember_105273.html&d=DQMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=b7uK7dJM4Fx7J_ehsuohEdD-6NdkoLyTwBFfHX-XKcc&m=2ty5V_F2rdMdBJPJVLuXAmeH-EXUvcMMe-ug_QqIqZA&s=byMygV6Z_7kXGJPWr5dD1wi0Gy13O7j0EXYEXDeW5Is&e=> ; I’d be interested how we could leverage a better serialization for various use-cases!
Best,
—
Mehdi
On Oct 14, 2016, at 11:32 AM, Will Dietz via llvm-dev <llvm...
2016 Oct 17
0
BoF: Shipping Software as LLVM IR (@Upcoming Dev Mtg)
...>> Somehow related, I posted this recently to llvm-dev: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-September/105273.html <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.llvm.org_pipermail_llvm-2Ddev_2016-2DSeptember_105273.html&d=DQMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=b7uK7dJM4Fx7J_ehsuohEdD-6NdkoLyTwBFfHX-XKcc&m=2ty5V_F2rdMdBJPJVLuXAmeH-EXUvcMMe-ug_QqIqZA&s=byMygV6Z_7kXGJPWr5dD1wi0Gy13O7j0EXYEXDeW5Is&e=> ; I’d be interested how we could leverage a better serialization for various use-cases!
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> —
>> Mehdi
>>
>>...
2016 Jul 22
4
ThinLTO status in trunk?
First, kudos on the ThinLTO results reported in your blog post — they’re impressive and the system sounds really well engineered.
I’m starting to try it out on a large piece of software and I’d like to make sure I know what to expect. The blog said it will be available in clang-3.9 but both clang-3.8 and trunk seem to have some degree of support for it. What is the status of ThinLTO in 3.8
2016 Oct 14
5
BoF: Shipping Software as LLVM IR (@Upcoming Dev Mtg)
Hi LLVM’ers!
We are hosting a BoF at this year's Dev Meeting on a subject we hope will
be of interest to some (many?) of you:
shipping software (entirely) as LLVM IR.
You can find our proposal in the meeting schedule online:
https://llvmdevelopersmeetingbay2016.sched.org/event/8Yzq/shipping-software-as-llvm-ir
The BoF is scheduled to last 45 minutes, which will go by very quickly!
To make
2016 Oct 27
1
BoF: Shipping Software as LLVM IR (@Upcoming Dev Mtg)
...;>> Somehow related, I posted this recently to llvm-dev: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-September/105273.html <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.llvm.org_pipermail_llvm-2Ddev_2016-2DSeptember_105273.html&d=DQMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=b7uK7dJM4Fx7J_ehsuohEdD-6NdkoLyTwBFfHX-XKcc&m=2ty5V_F2rdMdBJPJVLuXAmeH-EXUvcMMe-ug_QqIqZA&s=byMygV6Z_7kXGJPWr5dD1wi0Gy13O7j0EXYEXDeW5Is&e=> ; I’d be interested how we could leverage a better serialization for various use-cases!
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> —
>>> Mehd...
2016 Jun 21
5
What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 7:56 AM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Adve, Vikram Sadanand via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >>> Let me clarify. What I’m trying to say is that:
> >>
> >>> a) LLVM has a time-based release cycle, not a schedule-based one. As
>