search for: b7cda39

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "b7cda39".

2013 Jul 08
2
[PATCH] virtio-spec: add field for scsi command size
...;s use bit 30. Here's the kernel patch: virtio: VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT feature Also known as the "no really, I read the spec" bit. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h index b7cda39..4b5da48 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h @@ -51,4 +51,7 @@ * suppressed them? */ #define VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY 24 +/* Can the device handle any descriptor layout? */ +#define VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT 30 + #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_CON...
2013 Jul 08
2
[PATCH] virtio-spec: add field for scsi command size
...;s use bit 30. Here's the kernel patch: virtio: VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT feature Also known as the "no really, I read the spec" bit. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h index b7cda39..4b5da48 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h @@ -51,4 +51,7 @@ * suppressed them? */ #define VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY 24 +/* Can the device handle any descriptor layout? */ +#define VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT 30 + #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_CON...
2013 Jul 08
0
[PATCH] virtio-spec: add field for scsi command size
...Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> This is already used in qemu: /* A guest should never accept this. It implies negotiation is broken. */ #define VIRTIO_F_BAD_FEATURE 30 > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h > index b7cda39..4b5da48 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h > @@ -51,4 +51,7 @@ > * suppressed them? */ > #define VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY 24 > > +/* Can the device handle any descriptor layout? */ > +#define VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT...
2013 Jul 04
2
[PATCH] virtio-spec: add field for scsi command size
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:34:09PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> writes: > > Il 01/07/2013 01:47, Rusty Russell ha scritto: > >> > > > >> > > Mainly because I'm not sure that *all* devices are now safe. Are they? > >> > > >> > virtio-scsi's implementation in QEMU is not safe (been
2013 Jul 04
2
[PATCH] virtio-spec: add field for scsi command size
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:34:09PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> writes: > > Il 01/07/2013 01:47, Rusty Russell ha scritto: > >> > > > >> > > Mainly because I'm not sure that *all* devices are now safe. Are they? > >> > > >> > virtio-scsi's implementation in QEMU is not safe (been
2013 Mar 21
24
[PATCH 00/22] New virtio PCI layout
I've renewed this again, with some comments from HPA. I've tried to keep the new patches separate, so you can see the changes since we last discussed this (and so it's easy to back it out if we decide it's insane). I haven't even looked at the QEMU side so this is completely untested. Comments gratefully received! Rusty. Michael S Tsirkin (1): pci: add pci_iomap_range
2013 Mar 21
24
[PATCH 00/22] New virtio PCI layout
I've renewed this again, with some comments from HPA. I've tried to keep the new patches separate, so you can see the changes since we last discussed this (and so it's easy to back it out if we decide it's insane). I haven't even looked at the QEMU side so this is completely untested. Comments gratefully received! Rusty. Michael S Tsirkin (1): pci: add pci_iomap_range