search for: b74adfc4

On Jul 22, 2011, at 10:29 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > // Restrictions: > > There are several new invariants which will be enforced by the verifier: > > 1. A landing pad block is a basic block which is the unwind destination of an > invoke instruction. > 2. A landing pad block must have a landingpad instruction as its first non-PHI > instruction. > 3. The landingpad

...r at the top of a landing pad. It cannot appear in any other block, or following non-phi instructions. How does this differ from 2&3 above? Cameron -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110722/b74adfc4/attachment.html>

What? Yet another EH proposal?! This one is different from the others in that I'm planning to start implementing this shortly. But I want your feedback! I've all ready gotten a lot of feedback from Chris, John, Jim, Eric, and many others. Now is your turn! Please read this proposal and send me your comments, suggestions, and concerns. -bw