search for: b70716c0

Dear All, Time to add my two cents: I think incorporating something like APR into the LLVM tree is fine, given that it works, its licensing doesn't interefere with our licensing (and doesn't give me a headache), and we can merge it into the LLVM source base relatively seamlessly (i.e. users don't need to install it before building LLVM and APR plays nice with our build system).

On Sep 12, 2004, at 9:52 PM, Vikram Adve wrote: > I think we should be careful to isolate APR behind a "complete" > lib/System interface, i.e., not use it directly anywhere. If we do > that, it becomes strictly an implementation convenience and the > dependence is limited to that one part of the system. > > One concern I have with APR is their use of pool

...uot; section). > > -- John T. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040913/b70716c0/attachment.sig>