search for: b63e2bd

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "b63e2bd".

Did you mean: b63e2bde
2008 Aug 07
0
[LLVMdev] Casting between address spaces and address space semantics
Hi Matthijs, > >>> Specifically, I would like instcombining to be able to use this >>> info to >>> remove useless bitcasts. Also, this information is useful for >>> clang to >>> know when inserting an implicit cast makes sense and when it >>> would be an >>> error. >> Clang should just reject implicit casts in *any*
2008 Aug 07
2
[LLVMdev] Casting between address spaces and address space semantics
...erate pass for just this. So again, suggestions welcome. Gr. Matthijs -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: addrspaces.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 9792 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080807/b63e2bde/attachment.diff> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080807/b63e2bde/attachment.sig>
2008 Aug 06
2
[LLVMdev] Casting between address spaces and address space semantics
Hi all, I've been a tad busy in the last few weeks, but I don't think this issue is settled yet. > > the relations between each address space (equivalent, disjoint, subset/ > > superset). > > Any thoughts on that? Should they also belong in TargetData? > Only if absolutely required, see below. Is there any other place they would fit in better? What piece of below