search for: b5effd3815cc

...CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, DATA > > Danged if I know... um um RELOC business mucks things up? Argh, it shouldn't be READONLY for vmlinux either, but apparently that is working for mysterious reasons. Some architectures were in fact complaining that I broke that, and hence patch: b5effd3815cc ("debug: Fix __bug_table[] in arch linker scripts") I think we need professional help with this linking stuff, but who to ask?

...business mucks things up? > > > > Argh, it shouldn't be READONLY for vmlinux either, but apparently that > > is working for mysterious reasons. > > > > Some architectures were in fact complaining that I broke that, and hence > > patch: > > > > b5effd3815cc ("debug: Fix __bug_table[] in arch linker scripts") > > > > I think we need professional help with this linking stuff, but who to > > ask? > > Andy Lutomirski? Does this fix it? diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h index 39e702d...

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 03:36:08PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > Ok, a network outage gave me time to go hunting.  Indeed it is a bad > interaction with the tree DRM merged into.  All DRM did was to slip a > WARN_ON_ONCE() that nouveau triggers into a kernel module where such > things no longer warn, they blow the box out of the water.  I made a > dinky testcase module (attached),

...gt; > Danged if I know... um um RELOC business mucks things up? > > Argh, it shouldn't be READONLY for vmlinux either, but apparently that > is working for mysterious reasons. > > Some architectures were in fact complaining that I broke that, and hence > patch: > > b5effd3815cc ("debug: Fix __bug_table[] in arch linker scripts") > > I think we need professional help with this linking stuff, but who to > ask? Andy Lutomirski?