search for: b59c32a5

...m> wrote: > We can also do "gluster peer detach <hostname> force right? Just to be sure I setup a test 3 node vm gluster cluster :) then shut down one of the nodes and tried to remove it. root at gh1:~# gluster peer status Number of Peers: 2 Hostname: gh2.brian.softlog Uuid: b59c32a5-eb10-4630-b147-890a98d0e51d State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) Hostname: gh3.brian.softlog Uuid: 825afc5c-ead6-4c83-97a0-fbc9d8e19e62 State: Peer in Cluster (Disconnected root at gh1:~# gluster peer detach gh3 force peer detach: failed: gh3 is not part of cluster -- Lindsay -------------- nex...

...etach <hostname> force right? > > > > Just to be sure I setup a test 3 node vm gluster cluster :) then shut down > one of the nodes and tried to remove it. > > > root at gh1:~# gluster peer status > Number of Peers: 2 > > Hostname: gh2.brian.softlog > Uuid: b59c32a5-eb10-4630-b147-890a98d0e51d > > State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) > > Hostname: gh3.brian.softlog > Uuid: 825afc5c-ead6-4c83-97a0-fbc9d8e19e62 > State: Peer in Cluster (Disconnected > > > root at gh1:~# gluster peer detach gh3 force > peer detach: failed: gh3 is not p...

On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Jun 2017 at 06:25, Lindsay Mathieson < > lindsay.mathieson at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 11/06/2017 10:46 AM, WK wrote: >> > I thought you had removed vna as defective and then ADDED in vnh as >> > the replacement? >> > >> > Why is vna