Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "b5934348".
Did you mean:
593448
2017 Sep 18
0
Counterintuitive use of LLVMBool in C-API?
...ll contain a meaningful error code on return (the latter
>> is missing when you use a boolean type).
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170918/b5934348/attachment.html>
2016 Sep 12
1
Counterintuitive use of LLVMBool in C-API?
Of course, this is normal for C-APIs. But maybe change the name to
LLVMResult to propagate the real use? I am not arguing about the results
themself. They are standard. But the name is missguiding. As long as it's
consistent i know that i have to write an extra record operator in Delphi
to reflect this.
2016-09-12 11:11 GMT+02:00 David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk>:
> On