Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "b4ef29e5".
2013 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal: release MDNodes for source modules (LTO+debug info)
...ts when most are actually shared and don't get deleted. It sounds
like the metadata nodes are weird in that they are mostly disjoint between
modules.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131112/b4ef29e5/attachment.html>
2013 Nov 13
2
[LLVMdev] Proposal: release MDNodes for source modules (LTO+debug info)
On Nov 12, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> Other options are:
> 1> Using a different LLVMContext for the destination module, but it didn’t work out since Linker was not designed to work with different LLVMContexts for source vs destination.
> 2> removeUnusedMDNodes checks if a MDNode is used in a different way (i.e use_empty() &&