Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "b4a863b0".
Did you mean:
8fa863b0
2004 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] subtle problem with inst_iterator
...must
most changes are technical. Everything builds for me.
- Volodya
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: InstIterator.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 16414 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040427/b4a863b0/attachment.diff>
2004 Apr 23
0
[LLVMdev] subtle problem with inst_iterator
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Yea, I've noticed that. However, it looks like inst_iterator is iterator over
> pointers. Oh, wait a minite, that's the current code:
>
> inline IIty operator*() const { return BI; }
> inline IIty operator->() const { return operator*(); }
>
> So operator* works as if value_type is Instruction*, but operator->
2004 Apr 23
2
[LLVMdev] subtle problem with inst_iterator
Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > and since result of *it is considered to be rvalue it can't be accepted
> > by this operator. The complete discussion is in
> >
> > http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2002/n1385.htm
> >
> > I'd suggest to apply the following patch which makes operator* return
>