search for: b40

...turated model: db5 = - (k50+k56)*b5 + k56*b6 + c*g(t) + h db6 = + k65*b5 - (k60+k65)*b6 + d db5, db6 are the first derivatives, b5, b6 are the functions to be fitted. The remaining parameters are unknown and should follow from the fit. assuming that g(t) has the functional form: b4i + (b40-b4i)*exp(-k4*t) (after calculations of 2 papers of A4) follows the solution: L5L6 <- function(b40, b4i, k4, t, p50, p56, p60, p65, pc, ph, pd, pb50, pb60) { k50 <- exp(p50) k56 <- exp(p56) k60 <- exp(p60) k65 <- exp(p65) c <- exp(pc) h <- exp(ph) d...

..., H??vard ************ Browse[2]> formula.str y ~ -1 + b1 + b2 + b3 + b4 + b5 + b6 + b7 + b8 + b9 + b10 + b11 + b12 + b13 + b14 + b15 + b16 + b17 + b18 + b19 + b20 + b21 + b22 + b23 + b24 + b25 + b26 + b27 + b28 + b29 + b30 + b31 + b32 + b33 + b34 + b35 + b36 + b37 + b38 + b39 + b40 + b41 + b42 + b43 + b44 + b45 + b46 + b47 + b48 + b49 + elevation + f(idx, model = "sphere", sphere.dir = "global_temperature_80s", T.order = 2, K.order = 2, T.model = "rotsym", K.model = "rotsym", initial = c(-4, 1, 0), param = c(...

...48 176 82.8K 5.31M pool 571G 545G 48 313 283K 26.0M pool 571G 545G 299 130 1.05M 4.05M pool 571G 545G 163 160 932K 4.70M pool 571G 545G 320 0 1.02M 0 Is this an ARC issue or some sort of flush happening. This is B40.

Hello R users, For the last few days I am struggling with the following task: my data.frame: A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 58.81 53.292 54.501 13.013 17.39 19.407 56.02 56.251 54.033 20.099 13.15 10.411 55.376 53.099 57.625 13.396 21.031 13.22 58.584 53.194 54.218 13.038 16.854 19.289 55.7 55.921 53.847 19.942 13.153 9.828 55.093 52.934

..... [B00] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........ [B10] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........ [B20] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........ [B30] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........ [B40] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........ [B50] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........ [B60] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........ [B70] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........ [B80] 00...

..... [B00] 00 CD 00 03 03 FE 00 00 C1 56 00 F8 6D C1 01 00 ........ .V..m... [B10] F8 63 C0 01 F8 65 B1 FB 0E 01 FF 80 82 00 82 00 .c...e.. ........ [B20] CD 00 03 03 FE 00 00 C1 57 00 F8 6D C1 01 00 F8 ........ W..m.... [B30] 63 C0 01 F8 65 B1 FB 0E 01 FF 80 82 00 82 00 CD c...e... ........ [B40] 00 03 03 FE 00 00 C1 58 00 F8 6D C1 01 00 F8 63 .......X ..m....c [B50] C0 01 F8 65 B1 FB 2C 01 FF 80 B3 00 01 00 7F FB ...e..,. ........ [B60] FF F5 00 02 1F FF FF D8 00 F9 FF 02 FF FF F8 E4 ........ ........ [B70] 00 03 00 00 00 03 FD FF 02 FF FF F8 90 00 03 03 ........ ........ [B80] FE...

Hello all, After setting up a Solaris 10 machine with ZFS as the new NFS server, I''m stumped by some serious performance problems. Here are the (admittedly long) details (also noted at http://www.netmeister.org/blog/): The machine in question is a dual-amd64 box with 2GB RAM and two broadcom gigabit NICs. The OS is Solaris 10 6/06 and the filesystem consists of a single zpool stripe

Macros to use VMI calls from assembly and C languages are introduced. The macros are quite complex, but the end result is rather impressive. The result is that when compiling a VMI kernel, the native code is emitted inline, with no function call overhead, and some wiggle room for register allocation. The hypervisor compatibility code is emitted out of line into a separate section, and patched

Macros to use VMI calls from assembly and C languages are introduced. The macros are quite complex, but the end result is rather impressive. The result is that when compiling a VMI kernel, the native code is emitted inline, with no function call overhead, and some wiggle room for register allocation. The hypervisor compatibility code is emitted out of line into a separate section, and patched