search for: b3168959

> > > The logic to handle this has to go somewhere, putting it in the MCStreamer > *implementation* that needs it is the most logical place. We also aim to > implement an assembler, it doesn't make sense to duplicate this logic in the > compiler and the assembler parser. > > Assembly language has often been *the* intermediate form for between compilers and object

...coff backend patch to llvm-commit, but that apears to be the wrong place, where should I have posted it? llvm-commits is a great place for it! -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100505/b3168959/attachment.html>

On May 5, 2010, at 1:22 PM, Nathan Jeffords wrote: > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On May 4, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Nathan Jeffords wrote: > ... We basically want one MCStreamer callback to correspond to one statement in the .s file. This makes it easier to handle from the compiler standpoint, but is also very important for the llvm-mc