Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "b2a".
Did you mean:
b2
2010 May 12
1
Convert data.frame or matrix to list
Hi,
i have the following data.frame :
> Data[1:3,]
dt amt geoTree merTree ref
1 0.71002484 3.334570 A2b B2b 0
2 0.49074936 2.544464 A2b B1a 0
3 0.06223433 3.617133 A1b B2a 0
i want to convert it to a list, like this:
list(Data[1,],Data[2,],Data[3,])
[[1]]
dt amt geoTree merTree ref
1 0.07333459 0.969585 A2a A1a 0
[[2]]
dt amt geoTree merTree ref
2 0.5197299 4.489454 A2b A2b 0
[[3]]
dt amt geoTre...
2017 Mar 29
5
names
...mportados desde SPSS (que usa etiquetas).-
Mayormente, no tengo problemas, pero en una variable puntual veo que las
etiquetas de las variables "están" pero la clase del vector no me cierra y
los resultados no los usan. Trato de mostrarlo:
> na.omit(datos[, .(FORM, Region, Dependencia = B2a, Criterios =
D4_Otros.1)])
FORM Region Dependencia Criterios
1: 44 NEA Provinciales 8
2: 47 NEA Provinciales 8
3: 51 NEA Provinciales 8
4: 52 NEA Provinciales 8
5: 58 NEA Provinciales 8
6: 222 NOA Municipales 11...
2017 Mar 15
3
Crear una función
...tabla.1[, Porc := round(N/sum(N)*100,1), by =.(Region)]
tabla.1 <- spread(tabla.1[, .(etiqueta, Region, Porc)], key =
Region, value = Porc)
tabla.reg <- left_join(tabla, tabla.1)
# Depdendencia
tabla.1 <- datos[, .N, by = .(etiqueta = x, Dependencia = B2a)]
tabla.1[, Porc := round(N/sum(N)*100,1), by =.(Dependencia)] # %
por Dependencia
tabla.1 <- na.omit(tabla.1)
tabla.1 <- spread(tabla.1[, .(etiqueta, Dependencia, Porc)], key
= Dependencia, value = Porc)
tabla.dep <- left_join(tabla, tabla.1)
tabla...
2017 Mar 15
4
Fwd: Crear una función
... tabla.1[, Porc := round(N/sum(N)*100,1), by =.(Region)]
tabla.1 <- spread(tabla.1[, .(etiqueta, Region, Porc)], key = Region, value = Porc)
tabla.reg <- left_join(tabla, tabla.1)
# Depdendencia
tabla.1 <- datos[, .N, by = .(etiqueta = x, Dependencia = B2a)]
tabla.1[, Porc := round(N/sum(N)*100,1), by =.(Dependencia)] # % por Dependencia
tabla.1 <- na.omit(tabla.1)
tabla.1 <- spread(tabla.1[, .(etiqueta, Dependencia, Porc)], key = Dependencia, value = Porc)
tabla.dep <- left_join(tabla, tabla.1)
tabla...
2017 Jun 29
5
Friendly Reminder: Huge number of small files performance regression from 3.5.16 to 4.6.5 with identical smb.conf
Hello again, Jeremy and other Samba experts,
I'm sorry to be such a pain in your neck(s), but I still need your help
in looking for help trying to find out why SMB2/3.1.1 in Samba 4.6.5
performs so much worse than SMB/1.5 in Samba 3.6.15 in scenarios with a
huge number of small files.
As requested by Jeremy, I have done wireshark "pcapng" captures of the
four scenarios as