Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "b254f536".
2011 Jul 27
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM
On Jul 26, 2011, at 9:17 PM, Talin wrote:
> Here's an example of how this would be used: In the constructor for ConstantVector, there's an assert:
>
> assert(C->getType() == T->getElementType() &&
> "Initializer for vector element doesn't match vector element type!");
>
> I would change this to:
>
>
2011 Jul 28
2
[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM
...place first. And I'd use that
general mechanism in my own code regardless of whether it's used in LLVM or
not.
> -Chris
>
--
-- Talin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110728/b254f536/attachment.html>
2011 Jul 27
5
[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM
Here's an example of how this would be used: In the constructor for
ConstantVector, there's an assert:
assert(C->getType() == T->getElementType() &&
"Initializer for vector element doesn't match vector element
type!");
I would change this to:
ASSERT_STRM(C->getType() == T->getElementType(),
"Initializer for vector element "